Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change version numbers before 2.0 release #472

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nijtmans
Copy link
Collaborator

@nijtmans nijtmans commented Dec 5, 2019

The (microsoft) convension for dll's doesn't start with "lib" as on UNIX. So I suggest to use "tommath2.dll" as dll name. Also I made the other necessary corresponding makefile-related changes for the major upgrade.

@minad
Copy link
Member

minad commented Dec 5, 2019

The "big change" here is the name change of the dll. I am not sure if we want to include the version number in the name. This is the job of a distribution or package builder I think. @sjaeckel will take care of the other changes regarding the version numbers.

@nijtmans
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nijtmans commented Dec 5, 2019

On other platforms than Windows - indeed - it is not customary to have a version number in the library name. On Windows it's normal (examples: ws2_32.dll, zlib1.dll, winsqlite3.dll, tcl86.dll, msvcr100.dll ...). Windows dll's simply don't have a suitable mechanism as other platforms do.

@nijtmans
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ping?

Copy link
Contributor

@czurnieden czurnieden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you do us a favor and rebase on develop, if you don't mind? Thank you!

@sjaeckel
Copy link
Member

This will only be merged right before the 2.0.0 release, so there's no need to rebase now.

@sjaeckel sjaeckel added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Mar 10, 2020
@czurnieden
Copy link
Contributor

This will only be merged right before the 2.0.0 release, so there's no need to rebase now.

Ah, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants