Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Librarify #50

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Librarify #50

merged 16 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

petervdonovan
Copy link
Contributor

@petervdonovan petervdonovan commented Mar 3, 2024

This PR makes it possible to use parts of the Lingo code base in WebAssembly.

This PR is very experimental. It is also quite small, so the stakes are low here, and there isn't a big rush to get this merged.

The changes here are sufficient to a) compile this to WASM without errors, and b) make it easy to get the JSON build properties for a given LF file from JS/TS.

More changes would be required in order to make all of the functionality of Lingo work without panics; this is because apparently the norm in the Rust ecosystem is to panic at runtime when encountering an operation that doesn't support WASM instead of using Cargo features, which would result in compile-time errors.

Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
TODO: cherry-pick this change out to a new branch
@tanneberger
Copy link
Member

we probably should setup a github action which checks if lingo still can be compiled into wsm

@tanneberger tanneberger marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 18:28
@tanneberger tanneberger requested a review from lhstrh October 11, 2024 19:06
Copy link
Member

@lhstrh lhstrh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@lhstrh lhstrh merged commit a4a0f0f into main Oct 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@lhstrh lhstrh deleted the librarify branch October 16, 2024 18:11
@tanneberger tanneberger restored the librarify branch October 31, 2024 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants