Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: move to table of features for leptos #2044

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

docs: move to table of features for leptos #2044

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

chrisp60
Copy link
Contributor

This is a cosmetic change and may be opinionated. I find tables like this to be more readable.

For some it can be hard to parse without visual organization. No issue at all if it does not fall into line with your view for the docs.

I would not mind unifying the other crates if merged

here it is rendered on my local machine without any styles that docs.rs might add.
image

chrisp60 and others added 2 commits November 19, 2023 08:12
Thought this did something for linking to crates by name. Forgot to delete it
//! | rustls[^2] | **Networking**: Use [rustls]. | No |
//! | template_macro | **Templating**: Enables the legacy [template] macro. | No |
//!
//! [^1]: At least one **rendering** feature must be enabled. An Isomorphic crate may have
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This rewritten version sounds misleading to me. Exactly one should be enabled, not more than one.

@gbj
Copy link
Collaborator

gbj commented Nov 24, 2023

I like this overall, and thank you for it! I would prefer to keep the original wording about using one of csr, ssr, or hydrate.

@chrisp60
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey! I see your recommendations and you are correct. I'm a little overwhelmed with work at the moment but plan to revisit and correct this when I have the time. Thanks for the feedback.

I am going to move this to a draft for now.

@chrisp60 chrisp60 marked this pull request as draft November 29, 2023 22:50
@chrisp60 chrisp60 closed this by deleting the head repository Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants