-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore: to_additive various results on groups, group actions #20498
Conversation
AntoineChambert-Loir
commented
Jan 5, 2025
PR summary dde6eb3927Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
Current number | Change | Type |
---|---|---|
1514 | 1 | erw |
Current commit dde6eb3927
Reference commit a57f31753d
You can run this locally as
./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
- The
relative
value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic. - The
absolute
value is therelative
value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for splitting!
Sorry, I got bored halfway through, but there are more to fix. There are also several missing docstrings on the additivised versions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
maintainer delegate
theorem isBlock_subtypeVal {C : SubMulAction G X} {B : Set C} : | ||
IsBlock G (Subtype.val '' B : Set X) ↔ IsBlock G B := by | ||
refine forall₂_congr fun g₁ g₂ ↦ ?_ | ||
rw [← SubMulAction.inclusion.coe_eq, ← image_smul_set, ← image_smul_set, ne_eq, | ||
Set.image_eq_image C.inclusion_injective, disjoint_image_iff C.inclusion_injective] | ||
|
||
theorem _root_.AddAction.IsBlock.of_addsubgroup_of_conjugate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
theorem _root_.AddAction.IsBlock.of_addsubgroup_of_conjugate | |
theorem _root_.AddAction.IsBlock.of_addSubgroup_of_conjugate |
/-- A SubAddAction is a set which is closed under scalar multiplication. -/ | ||
structure SubAddAction (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [VAdd R M] : Type v where | ||
/-- The underlying set of a `SubAddAction`. -/ | ||
carrier : Set M | ||
/-- The carrier set is closed under scalar multiplication. -/ | ||
vadd_mem' : ∀ (c : R) {x : M}, x ∈ carrier → c +ᵥ x ∈ carrier | ||
|
||
attribute [to_additive] SubMulAction |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you swap SubAddAction
and SubMulAction
around and tag SubMulAction
with to_additive
straight away?
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by YaelDillies. |
bors d+ |
✌️ AntoineChambert-Loir can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors r+
Le 6 janvier 2025 20:55:52 GMT+01:00, "mathlib-bors[bot]" ***@***.***> a écrit :
…✌️ AntoineChambert-Loir can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with `bors r+`. More detailed instructions are available [here](https://bors.tech/documentation/getting-started/#reviewing-pull-requests).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#20498 (comment)
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
@AntoineChambert-Loir, you didn't address my final comments (probably because you didn't see them via the email system) |
i' sorry, can you please send it back to me so that i can address it immediately
Le 7 janvier 2025 08:59:22 GMT+01:00, "Yaël Dillies" ***@***.***> a écrit :
…
@AntoineChambert-Loir, you didn't address my final comments (probably because you didn't see them via the email system)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#20498 (comment)
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Two adjustments to #20498 that had been requested by @YaelDillies but hadn't been implemented on time before merge.
Two adjustments to #20498 that had been requested by Yaël but hadn't been implemented on time before merge.