Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: [DO_NOT_MERGE] Change 2404 to 2204 #5228

Closed

Conversation

willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is for running the upgrade test and figuring out issues found in #4575 (comment)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from willie-yao. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 31, 2024
@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.79%. Comparing base (0957852) to head (d71321a).
Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5228   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.78%   52.79%           
=======================================
  Files         270      270           
  Lines       29043    29043           
=======================================
+ Hits        15330    15332    +2     
+ Misses      12922    12920    -2     
  Partials      791      791           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

mboersma commented Nov 1, 2024

We haven't actually published 22.04 images, so this will 404. But I will do so now and we can see if this is the fix.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

mboersma commented Nov 1, 2024

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 1, 2024

@willie-yao: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade d71321a link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

mboersma commented Nov 1, 2024

Even with Ubuntu 22.04, we're still spinning up new machines.

Does the upgrade test actually use an earlier version of CAPZ that still defaults to Marketplace images, then move to main where we default to the community gallery? Something like that would certainly cause a diff.

Maybe we should see if it's possible to skip this spec from the apiversion upgrade test. Or do we consider not rolling the machines on an upgrade to be core functionality here?

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the CAPI test it considers any rollouts as a failure of upgrade so there's really no way around that. I guess we'll just have to disable the test in the meantime? Or is there a way to set the image of just this test to the Azure Marketplace image.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

/close

I think #5266 made this change not necessary any more. (@willie-yao please re-open if I'm wrong!)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

I think #5266 made this change not necessary any more. (@willie-yao please re-open if I'm wrong!)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants