📖 Added CAPA own getting-started instead of using CAPI embedded getting-started

[hackeramitkumar]

What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
We are using CAPI embedded getting started. But that are causing many broken links and also have extra informations that are not required for CAPA users.
So I have added CAPA own getting-started.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #4067

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests
• adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vincepri for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Ankitasw]

I think we don't need other providers links here.

[hackeramitkumar]

Sure I will remove the unnecessary links from here.
thanks for pointing out it.

[Ankitasw]

Could you please fix below error in md-lint?

Error: src/getting-started.md: link "./topics/reference/glossary.md#bootstrap-cluster" points to a non-existing slug

[hackeramitkumar]

Could you please fix below error in md-lint?

Error: src/getting-started.md: link "./topics/reference/glossary.md#bootstrap-cluster" points to a non-existing slug

@Ankitasw I have mentioned above 3 approaches. By these all 3 approaches md-lint error will be gone.
Can you tell me , which approach I should follow?

[Ankitasw]

@Ankitasw I have mentioned above 3 approaches. By these all 3 approaches md-lint error will be gone.
Can you tell me , which approach I should follow?

I miss to find the approaches, could you paste it here again?

[hackeramitkumar]

@Ankitasw I have mentioned above 3 approaches. By these all 3 approaches md-lint error will be gone.
Can you tell me , which approach I should follow?

I miss to find the approaches, could you paste it here again?

Here we are using embeded glosary.md. So when we are doing glossary.md#bootstrap-cluster then the workflow are not able to identify it so it is showing error because in CAPA glosary there is nothing related to #bootstrap-cluster.
So for fixing this issue there are following ways -

1. We can ignore these checks and merge the PR.
2. We can remove these navigation to particular defination and navigate them to only glosary.md.
3. We should add our own glosary.md for CAPA. ( But I do not think it will be good idea ).

[Ankitasw]

So the first one is not an option for us, we cannot ignore this error as it will fail for other PRs as well.
3rd one is cumbersome.
I am not sure if I understand the 2nd option. Which navigation can be removed, could you please point in the doc.

[Ankitasw]

Hey @hackeramitkumar do you need any help here?

[hackeramitkumar]

@Ankitasw thanks for asking. I have almost done it. I will complete it till tomorrow.

[Ankitasw]

No hurry, take your time 😄

[hackeramitkumar]

@Ankitasw please review it. And let me know if any changes are required...

[Ankitasw]

This link still doesn't work, could you check it?

[Ankitasw]

@hackeramitkumar do you need any support to continue this PR?

[nrb]

@hackeramitkumar Are you still able to continue with this PR?

Also, could you add Closes: #3453 to the description? You mentioned that this change would fix those issues, as well.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Close this PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

[k8s-ci-robot]

@hackeramitkumar: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker	6f6f951	link	true	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Reopen this PR with /reopen
• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

[k8s-ci-robot]

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Reopen this PR with /reopen
• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.