Work on slides

mare/add-font.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+for f in *.svg; do
+  if grep -q 'stream;base64,d09GMk9UVE8AAO9AAAkAA' "$f"; then
+    echo "Already processed: $f"
+  else
+    echo "Processing $f..."
+    csplit $f '/src: url("https://excalidraw.com/Virgil.woff2");/'
+    ( head -n -2 xx00 ; cat virgil-font.txt ; tail -n +3 xx01 ) > $f
+    rm xx*
+  fi
+done

mare/slides.md

@@ -33,16 +33,28 @@ Something like a _"research integrity CAPTCHA"_<br> or a _"journal entry visa"_?
 ### _Public Manuscript Registration_
 
 - Mandatory public registration before submission to journal
-- Minimal info: ORCID of main author + title of manuscript
-- Journals may later add public notes, positive or negative, e.g. "all integrity checks passed" or "data not available"
+- Minimal info: first author name/ORCID + title of manuscript
+- Journals may later add public notes, positive or negative
+
+---
+
+## _Registering:_
+
+![form](mare-form.excalidraw.svg)
+
+---
+
+## _Checking:_
+
+![view](mare-view.excalidraw.svg)
 
 ---
 
 ## Goal
 
 - Requirement for exposure of manuscript/author to negative flagging _keeps away bad actors from the start_
 
-- _Possibility_ of flagging is sufficient (mostly): journals don't actually need to publish notes about manuscripts
+- _Possibility_ of flagging is sufficient (mostly): journals don't actually need to publish notes about manuscript
 
 ---
 
@@ -52,7 +64,7 @@ Something like a _"research integrity CAPTCHA"_<br> or a _"journal entry visa"_?
 
 - _Note on journal submission page:_ "Important: Register your manuscript here [link] before submission"
 - Editors-in-chief check whether _new submissions are found on registration site_; if not send desk-rejects
-- Editors-in-chief make sure for camera-ready papers that _author/ORCID of original registration is present_
+- Editors-in-chief make sure for camera-ready papers that _first author name/ORCID matches registration_
 
 &nbsp;
 
@@ -70,11 +82,41 @@ _We don't know..._
 
 - Develop a _prototype_ with all core features
 - Use the prototype to show it to _key actors_ (people at Sage, editors-in-chief, editors, authors), and get feedback
-- Run a _small test_ at a selected Sage journal (e.g. testing it as optional step, or mandatory step for 1 week)
+- Run a _small test_ at a selected Sage journal (e.g. testing it as optional step, or mandatory step for 1 week, etc.)
 - _Evaluate_ and decide on whether to continue and expand
 
 ---
 
-## Your Feedback
+## That's it!
 
 We'd love to hear your thoughts on this proposal.
+
+(extra slides follow)
+
+---
+
+## Gaming Made Hard...
+
+_Ensuring ORCID belongs to first author:_
+
+- First author needs to register via ORCID to do registration
+- Submission system requires first author to verify via ORCID (or more advanced: check via secret co-authorship code shown after registration)
+
+_Incentives against use of throw-away ORCID identifiers:_
+
+- Final accepted paper will have same ORCID and name!
+- Many manuscripts registered under same name but different ORCIDs will look suspicious
+- Varying your name/ORCID is bad for visibility/reputation
+
+---
+
+## Extra Fields
+
+_Further possible (optional) registration fields:_
+
+- ROR of organization
+- Preprint URLs
+- Checkbox for compliance with integrity guidelines
+- ...
+
+