Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[AArch64][SME2] Add register allocation hints for ZPRMulReg #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sme2-form-strided-pseudo
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[AArch64][SME2] Add register allocation hints for ZPRMulReg #1

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kmclaughlin-arm
Copy link
Owner

This patch implements getRegAllocationHints to improve register
allocation for the ZPR2Mul2Reg & ZPR4Mul4Reg classes.
If a FORM_STRIDED_TUPLE is found, getRegAllocationHints will try
to find a contiguous ZPRMulReg beginning with the same subregister
as the first operand of the pseudo.

For example, if the first strided load has been assigned $z16_z20_z24_z28
and the operands of the pseudo are each accessing subregister zsub2, the
correct register to use would be $z24_z25_z26_z27.

@kmclaughlin-arm
[AArch64][SME2] Add register allocation hints for ZPRMulReg
78049e1 
This patch implements getRegAllocationHints to improve register
allocation for the ZPR2Mul2Reg & ZPR4Mul4Reg classes.
If a FORM_STRIDED_TUPLE is found, getRegAllocationHints will try
to find a contiguous ZPRMulReg beginning with the same subregister
as the first operand of the pseudo.

For example, if the first strided load has been assigned $z16_z20_z24_z28
and the operands of the pseudo are each accessing subregister zsub2, the
correct register to use would be $z24_z25_z26_z27.
kmclaughlin-arm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
@kparzysz
[flang][OpenMP] Normalize clause modifiers that exist on their own (l…
cfd67c2 
…lvm#116655)

This is the first part of the effort to make parsing of clause modifiers
more uniform and robust. Currently, when multiple modifiers are allowed,
the parser will expect them to appear in a hard-coded order.
Additionally, modifier properties (such as "ultimate") are checked
separately for each case.

The overall plan is
1. Extract all modifiers into their own top-level classes, and then
equip them with sets of common properties that will allow performing the
property checks generically, without refering to the specific kind of
the modifier.
2. Define a parser (as a separate class) for each modifier.
3. For each clause define a union (std::variant) of all allowable
modifiers, and parse the modifiers as a list of these unions.

The intent is also to isolate parts of the code that could eventually be
auto-generated.

OpenMP modifier overhaul: #1/3
kmclaughlin-arm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
@dty2
[flang]Add new intrinsic function backtrace and complete the TODO of …
159e601 
…abort (llvm#117603)

Hey guys, I found that Flang's built-in ABORT function is incomplete
when I was using it. Compared with gfortran's ABORT (which can both
abort and print out a backtrace), flang's ABORT implementation lacks the
function of printing out a backtrace. This feature is essential for
debugging and understanding the call stack at the failure point.

To solve this problem, I completed the "// TODO:" of the abort function,
and then implemented an additional built-in function BACKTRACE for
flang. After a brief reading of the relevant source code, I used
backtrace and backtrace_symbols in "execinfo.h" to quickly implement
this. But since I used the above two functions directly, my
implementation is slightly different from gfortran's implementation (in
the output, the function call stack before main is additionally output,
and the function line number is missing). In addition, since I used the
above two functions, I did not need to add -g to embed debug information
into the ELF file, but needed -rdynamic to ensure that the symbols are
added to the dynamic symbol table (so that the function name will be
printed out).

Here is a comparison of the output between gfortran 's backtrace and my
implementation:
gfortran's implemention output:
```
#0  0x557eb71f4184 in testfun2_
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:5
#1  0x557eb71f4165 in testfun1_
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:13
#2  0x557eb71f4192 in test_backtrace
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:17
llvm#3  0x557eb71f41ce in main
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:18
```
my impelmention output:
```
Backtrace:
#0 ./test(_FortranABacktrace+0x32) [0x574f07efcf92]
#1 ./test(testfun2_+0x14) [0x574f07efc7b4]
#2 ./test(testfun1_+0xd) [0x574f07efc7cd]
llvm#3 ./test(_QQmain+0x9) [0x574f07efc7e9]
llvm#4 ./test(main+0x12) [0x574f07efc802]
llvm#5 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x25e08) [0x76954694fe08]
llvm#6 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8c) [0x76954694fecc]
llvm#7 ./test(_start+0x25) [0x574f07efc6c5]
```
test program is:
```
function testfun2() result(err)
  implicit none
  integer :: err
  err = 1
  call backtrace
end function testfun2

subroutine testfun1()
  implicit none
  integer :: err
  integer :: testfun2

  err = testfun2()
end subroutine testfun1

program test_backtrace
  call testfun1()
end program test_backtrace
```
I am well aware of the importance of line numbers, so I am now working
on implementing line numbers (by parsing DWARF information) and
supporting cross-platform (Windows) support.
kmclaughlin-arm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
@Michael137
Revert "Re-apply [lldb] Do not use LC_FUNCTION_STARTS data to determi…
9a4c5a5 
…ne symbol size as symbols are created (llvm#117079)"

This reverts commit ba668eb.

Below test started failing again on x86_64 macOS CI. We're unsure
if this patch is the exact cause, but since this patch has broken
this test before, we speculatively revert it to see if it was indeed
the root cause.
```
FAIL: lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test (1692 of 2162)
******************** TEST 'lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 7: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
RUN: at line 8: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit | /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test
/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test:21:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
         ^
<stdin>:26:64: note: scanning from here
 frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp
                                                               ^
<stdin>:27:2: note: possible intended match here
 frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0
 ^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
            .
            .
            .
           21:  0x100003ed1 <+0>: pushq %rbp
           22:  0x100003ed2 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp
           23: (lldb) thread backtrace -u
           24: * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
           25:  * frame #0: 0x0000000100003ecc trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`bar
           26:  frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp
check:21'0                                                                    X error: no match found
           27:  frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:21'1      ?                             possible intended match
           28:  frame llvm#3: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           29:  frame llvm#4: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           30:  frame llvm#5: 0x00007ff8193cc41f dyld`start + 1903
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           31: (lldb) exit
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@kmclaughlin-arm