Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Features/design #73

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024
Merged

Features/design #73

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

abdheshnayak
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak merged commit 55b34a7 into release-1.0.5 Jan 26, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Copy link

Pull Request Review Markdown

Hey there! 👋 Here's a summary of the previous results for your pull request:

Changes

  • Major changes:
    1. Renamed cli_CoreUpdateDevicePorts to cli_updateDeviceCluster.
    2. Added new mutation cli_updateDeviceNs.
    3. Renamed cli_CoreUpdateDeviceEnv to cli_coreUpdateDeviceEnv.

Suggestions

  • Suggestions to improve code:
    • In logger.tsx, remove the unused import statement for logger.
    • In route.tsx, remove the unused import statement for useEffect.

Bugs

  • Potential bugs:
    • In logger.tsx, there is a commented out code block that might cause confusion.

Improvements

  • Refactoring for better readability:
    • In logger.tsx, instead of using a ref for scrolling, consider using the scrollToIndex method provided by the ViewportList component. Here's an example:
      const listRef = useRef(null);
      
      useEffect(() => {
        // ...
        if (follow && listRef.current) {
          listRef.current.scrollToIndex({
            index: data.length - 1,
          });
        }
        // ...
      }, [data, maxLines]);
      
      // ...
      
      <ViewportList
        items={showAll ? data : searchResult}
        ref={listRef}
      >
        {/* ... */}
      </ViewportList>

Rating

  • Rating: 8
  • Criteria:
    • Readability: The code is generally well-structured and easy to follow.
    • Performance: The code seems to be efficient and doesn't have any obvious performance issues.
    • Security: It's difficult to assess security without more context, but the code doesn't contain any obvious security vulnerabilities.

Commit History

Here's a quick overview of the commit history:

  • Added health check
  • Merged branch 'features/design' of github.com:kloudlite/web into features/design
  • 🎨 Cli queries updated

Premium Plan

By the way, have you considered our premium plan? It offers advanced analysis for bigger pull requests. Let us know if you're interested!

That's it for the summary. Let me know if you need any further assistance! 😄

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: The pull request introduces enhancements to the GraphQL queries and mutations related to device management, specifically around VPN devices. It adds new mutations for updating device clusters and namespaces, and it refactors existing queries to streamline the codebase by removing redundant or unused queries. Additionally, the PR includes changes to the console components, such as logging improvements and state management adjustments.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
📝 Complexity: the changes are too large or complex for Sourcery to approve.
  • Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.
  • Files deleted: Sourcery does not currently approve diffs with deleted files.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the new GraphQL mutations are receiving the necessary variables for proper execution. The current implementation has empty vars functions which may lead to runtime errors if the mutations require input variables.
  • Review the naming conventions for consistency across the codebase, particularly for the newly added mutations and queries.
  • Verify that the removal of certain queries and mutations does not affect other parts of the application that may rely on them.
  • Check the frontend changes, especially the logging and state management updates, to ensure they integrate smoothly with the existing application flow and do not introduce any regressions.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

}
),
cli_updateDeviceNs: executor(
gql`
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): The vars function for cli_updateDeviceCluster is empty and does not pass any variables to the GraphQL mutation. This might be an oversight if the mutation expects variables to be provided.

@@ -2,7 +2,35 @@ import gql from 'graphql-tag';
import { IExecutor } from '~/root/lib/server/helpers/execute-query-with-context';

export const vpnQueries = (executor: IExecutor) => ({
cli_CoreUpdateDevicePorts: executor(
cli_updateDeviceCluster: executor(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The renaming of cli_CoreUpdateDevicePorts to cli_coreUpdateDevicePorts is inconsistent with the new addition cli_updateDeviceCluster, which does not follow the lowercase convention. Consider renaming to maintain consistent naming conventions.

abdheshnayak added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
tulsiojha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
abdheshnayak added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants