Updated website #71
Updated website #71
Conversation
tulsiojha
commented
Jan 25, 2024
tulsiojha
commented
- Made website responsive
Pull Request Review Markdown DocHey there! 👋 Here's a summary of the previous results for the pull request review. Let's dive in! Changes
Suggestions
Bugs
ImprovementsOne place in the code that could be refactored for better readability is in line 13 of // Before
<HeaderSecondary activePath={activePath} />
// After
<HeaderSecondary />RatingThe code has been rated on a scale of 0 to 10 based on the following criteria:
Unfortunately, the specific rating and explanation were not provided in the previous results. Commit HistoryThe commit history shows that the website has been updated. However, no specific details about the changes made in the update were mentioned. Premium PlanIt's worth mentioning that we have a premium plan available, which offers more advanced features and analysis capabilities for larger pull requests. This can be particularly useful for analyzing big pull requests and ensuring code quality. That's it for the summary! If you have any further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask. Good luck with the pull request! 🚀 |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Type: Enhancement
PR Summary: The pull request introduces responsive design enhancements to various components within the website, including adjustments to padding, margins, and display properties to improve the user experience across different screen sizes. It also includes the addition of new components and utilities to support responsive behavior.
Decision: Comment
📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
- Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
📝 Complexity: the changes are too large or complex for Sourcery to approve.
- Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.
- Big diff: the diff is too large to approve with confidence.
General suggestions:
- Review the use of
!importantin utility classes to ensure specificity issues are addressed without overriding necessary styles. - Avoid using
@ts-ignoreand instead address the TypeScript compiler's type checks directly to maintain type safety. - Ensure that negative margins and responsive design changes do not cause layout shifts or inconsistencies across different screen sizes.
- Consider modularizing large components for better maintainability and readability.
- Verify the performance impact of newly added icons and components to ensure they do not affect page load times.
- Ensure that form elements have proper validation and error handling for a good user experience.
- Make sure that legal and policy-related content such as privacy policies and terms of service are presented in a user-friendly manner.
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| @@ -22,18 +23,24 @@ export const AdvantageItem = ({ | |||
| }: IHorizontalTopTabItem) => { | |||
| return ( | |||
| <div | |||
| className="flex flex-col gap-4xl py-5xl px-4xl bg-surface-basic-default relative cursor-pointer" | |||
| className="flex flex-col gap-2xl p-3xl lg:gap-4xl lg:!py-5xl lg:!px-4xl bg-surface-basic-default relative cursor-pointer xl:min-h-[192px] xl:max-h-[192px]" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The use of ! in utility classes like lg:!py-5xl and lg:!px-4xl can be a sign of specificity issues in the CSS. It's worth reviewing if the overrides are necessary or if there's a cleaner way to structure the CSS to avoid using !important.
| @@ -53,11 +57,12 @@ export const SuccessStoryDetailCard = ({ | |||
| variant="basic" | |||
| /> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div className="flex-1"> | |||
| {extra} | |||
| <div className="flex-1 -mx-3xl -mb-3xl md:!mx-0 md:!mb-0"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (llm): The negative margins -mx-3xl -mb-3xl are reset for md breakpoints. This could lead to unexpected layout shifts. Verify that the negative margins are necessary and that the layout behaves as intended across breakpoints.
| } | ||
| return { | ||
| a: A, | ||
| ul: (props) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (llm): The custom ul component implementation should ensure that it doesn't override any existing classes when props.className is provided. The current implementation seems to replace the existing class with 'list-disc pl-5xl' if props.className is not provided, which might not be the intended behavior.
| @@ -13,12 +13,13 @@ const HeaderSecondary = ({ | |||
| activePath?: PageItem[]; | |||
| }) => { | |||
| const { config } = useConfig(); | |||
|
|
|||
| console.log('header ', activePath); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (llm): Console logs should be removed from production code as they can expose potentially sensitive information and clutter the console output.
| return ( | ||
| <svg | ||
| xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
| xmlnsXlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" | ||
| width="400" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (llm): Removing the width and height attributes from the SVG element may affect its display if not controlled by CSS. Ensure that the SVG is styled appropriately with responsive design in mind.
| @@ -0,0 +1,486 @@ | |||
| import { CheckCircleFill, ArrowRight, Stack } from '@jengaicons/react'; | |||
| import { Button } from 'kl-design-system/atoms/button'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The new page component is quite large and could benefit from further modularization. Consider breaking down the component into smaller, more manageable pieces to improve maintainability and readability.
| @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ | |||
| import { TextInput } from 'kl-design-system/atoms/input'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question (llm): Verify that the new input components from 'kl-design-system' are accessible, including proper labeling and keyboard navigation.
| @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ | |||
| import Container from '~/app/components/container'; | |||
| import { Button } from 'kl-design-system/atoms/button'; | |||
| import { TextInput, TextArea } from 'kl-design-system/atoms/input'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): Ensure that form elements like 'TextInput' and 'TextArea' have proper validation and error handling to provide a good user experience.
| @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ | |||
| import Chips from 'kl-design-system/atoms/chips'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question (llm): Verify that the new components such as 'Chips' from 'kl-design-system' are consistent with the design system and branding guidelines of the application.
| <span className="headingMd">September 15th, 2021</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="bodyLg text-text-strong flex flex-col gap-5xl pt-4xl"> | ||
| <p className="text-text-soft"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The terms of service should be easily accessible and presented in a format that encourages reading, such as through the use of headings, short paragraphs, and bullet points.
