Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed provider server error #70

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

Fixed provider server error #70

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

tulsiojha
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fixed provider server error

Copy link

Pull Request Report

Hello! Here's the report for the pull request:

Changes

  1. Added a console.log statement at line 28 in src/apps/auth/routes/_providers+/_layout.tsx.

Suggestions

  • Consider using a logger instead of console.log for better error handling. Point to line 28 in src/apps/auth/routes/_providers+/_layout.tsx.

Bugs

  • No bugs found.

Improvements

  • No improvements found.

Rating

I would rate the code as follows:

  • Readability: 8/10
  • Performance: 9/10
  • Security: 7/10

That's it for the report! Let me know if you need any further assistance.

@tulsiojha tulsiojha enabled auto-merge January 24, 2024 12:05
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Bug fix

PR Summary: The pull request addresses an issue with provider server error handling by modifying the logging approach within the authentication route.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Bug fix' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the change from a structured logger to console.log aligns with the application's logging strategy, especially for production environments.
  • Consider reverting the change if it was intended for temporary debugging purposes to maintain consistency with the existing logging practices.
  • If the change to console.log is intentional, provide context in the PR description about why this approach is preferred over the existing logger.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ export const restActions = async (ctx: IRemixCtx) => {
).checkOauthEnabled({});

if (checkError) {
logger.error(checkError);
// logger.error(checkError);
console.log(checkError);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): Replacing a logger call with console.log is generally not advisable in production code, as it may not adhere to the logging levels and formats defined by the application's logging strategy. If this change is for debugging purposes, it should be reverted before merging.

@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak disabled auto-merge January 24, 2024 12:06
@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak merged commit 773bc96 into release-1.0.5 Jan 24, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak deleted the features/design branch January 24, 2024 12:07
abdheshnayak added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
tulsiojha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
abdheshnayak added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants