Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated structure #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

updated structure #142

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

nxtcoder19
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @nxtcoder19 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the renaming of roles to more descriptive identifiers does not impact other parts of the application where these roles are used.
  • Verify that the changes in role names and their handling in the UI improve clarity and maintain a positive user experience.
  • Consider the broader impact of these changes on documentation or user guides, especially if role names are referenced directly.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Comment on lines +43 to -47
role: props?.data.role || 'account_member',
}
: {
email: '',
role: 'member',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Removing the call to mapRoleToDisplayName for the default role value and directly setting it to 'account_member' simplifies the code. However, ensure that this change does not affect the UI or user experience negatively, especially in terms of displaying user-friendly role names.

@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ const Root = (props: IDialog) => {
{roles.map((role) => {
return (
<SelectPrimitive.Option key={role} value={role}>
{role}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Reintroducing mapRoleToDisplayName in the rendering of role options is a good practice for maintaining user-friendly display names in the UI. This change ensures that the internal role naming conventions do not affect the user experience.

@nxtcoder19 nxtcoder19 merged commit 890719a into release-v1.0.5 Mar 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@nxtcoder19 nxtcoder19 deleted the fix/labels-update branch March 14, 2024 04:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants