Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v1.0.3 #134

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024
Merged

Release v1.0.3 #134

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

abdheshnayak
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @abdheshnayak - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

General suggestions:

  • Review the choice of debounce interval to ensure it aligns with user interaction patterns and expectations.
  • Consider the implications of changing logging levels on debugging and ensure consistency across the application.
  • Evaluate the chosen pagination size for fetching node pools to balance performance with user needs.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Comment on lines +68 to +75
return api.listNodePools({
clusterName: parseName(cluster),
pagination: {
first: 100,
orderBy: 'updateTime',
sortDirection: 'DESC',
},
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (performance): Adding pagination with a 'first' limit of 100 and sorting by 'updateTime' DESC is a good practice for handling potentially large datasets. This ensures the UI remains responsive and the data presented is the most relevant. However, consider if 100 is the optimal number based on the average use case and UI design.

Suggested change
return api.listNodePools({
clusterName: parseName(cluster),
pagination: {
first: 100,
orderBy: 'updateTime',
sortDirection: 'DESC',
},
});
return api.listNodePools({
clusterName: parseName(cluster),
pagination: {
first: 100, // Consider adjusting this value based on UI design and average use case. Lower if UI gets sluggish or if less data is typically needed.
orderBy: 'updateTime',
sortDirection: 'DESC',
},
});

@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ import { useEffect } from 'react';

export const useLog = (data: any) => {
useEffect(() => {
console.trace(data);
console.log(data);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Changing from console.trace to console.log reduces the verbosity of the logging, making it cleaner for debugging purposes. However, ensure that this change aligns with the debugging needs. console.trace can be useful for tracking call stacks, especially in complex applications.

Suggested change
console.log(data);
console.log('Data logged:', data);

@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak merged commit 471dfe0 into main Mar 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@abdheshnayak abdheshnayak deleted the release-v1.0.3 branch March 10, 2024 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant