-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v1.0.3 #134
Release v1.0.3 #134
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @abdheshnayak - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
General suggestions:
- Review the choice of debounce interval to ensure it aligns with user interaction patterns and expectations.
- Consider the implications of changing logging levels on debugging and ensure consistency across the application.
- Evaluate the chosen pagination size for fetching node pools to balance performance with user needs.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
return api.listNodePools({ | ||
clusterName: parseName(cluster), | ||
pagination: { | ||
first: 100, | ||
orderBy: 'updateTime', | ||
sortDirection: 'DESC', | ||
}, | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (performance): Adding pagination with a 'first' limit of 100 and sorting by 'updateTime' DESC is a good practice for handling potentially large datasets. This ensures the UI remains responsive and the data presented is the most relevant. However, consider if 100 is the optimal number based on the average use case and UI design.
return api.listNodePools({ | |
clusterName: parseName(cluster), | |
pagination: { | |
first: 100, | |
orderBy: 'updateTime', | |
sortDirection: 'DESC', | |
}, | |
}); | |
return api.listNodePools({ | |
clusterName: parseName(cluster), | |
pagination: { | |
first: 100, // Consider adjusting this value based on UI design and average use case. Lower if UI gets sluggish or if less data is typically needed. | |
orderBy: 'updateTime', | |
sortDirection: 'DESC', | |
}, | |
}); |
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ import { useEffect } from 'react'; | |||
|
|||
export const useLog = (data: any) => { | |||
useEffect(() => { | |||
console.trace(data); | |||
console.log(data); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (code_refinement): Changing from console.trace to console.log reduces the verbosity of the logging, making it cleaner for debugging purposes. However, ensure that this change aligns with the debugging needs. console.trace can be useful for tracking call stacks, especially in complex applications.
console.log(data); | |
console.log('Data logged:', data); |
No description provided.