Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KLO-128 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services #118

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

nxtCoder19
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves kloudlite/kloudlite#54

Attachment

Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 3 02 17 PM Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 3 02 41 PM Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 7 19 38 PM

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: This pull request introduces the ability for users to select node pools while creating applications and project managed services. It involves updates to the UI components for selecting node pools, integrating new data fetching logic for node pools, and ensuring the selected node pool information is correctly utilized and displayed in the application and service configuration steps. The changes span across multiple components, including form fields for node pool selection and review components for displaying the selected node pool details.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Consider abstracting the data fetching and state management logic related to node pools into custom hooks or services. This could simplify the components and make the logic reusable.
  • Ensure that the UI gracefully handles loading and error states when fetching node pools. Providing clear feedback to the user in these scenarios can significantly improve the user experience.
  • Given the addition of new features and complexity, it might be beneficial to review the overall architecture and consider further refactoring to maintain code readability and ease of maintenance.
  • While the pull request adds significant functionality, ensuring that all new paths and edge cases are covered by automated tests would be crucial for maintaining the reliability of the application.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -276,6 +282,21 @@ const FieldView = ({
handleChange={handleChange}
nameErrorLabel="isNameError"
/>

<Select
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The implementation of the 'Select' component for 'Nodepool Name' is well-integrated with the form's state management and validation schema. The use of async options loading and the 'creatable' prop provides a flexible user experience. However, consider handling the scenario where the async loading fails more gracefully, ensuring the user is informed and can retry or proceed with manual input.

import useCustomSwr from '~/lib/client/hooks/use-custom-swr';
import { useConsoleApi } from '~/console/server/gql/api-provider';
import { useMapper } from '~/components/utils';
import { registryHost } from '~/lib/configs/base-url.cjs';
import { BottomNavigation } from '~/console/components/commons';
import { plans } from './datas';
import {useOutletContext } from '@remix-run/react';
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): The refactored code introduces additional complexity compared to the original version, primarily due to increased dependencies, more intricate state management, and the addition of new UI elements. Here are a few suggestions to streamline the implementation:

  1. Abstract Data Fetching: Consider encapsulating the data fetching logic into custom hooks or services. This not only reduces the complexity within the component but also makes the data fetching logic reusable and easier to maintain.

  2. Simplify State Management: There's an opportunity to simplify state management by consolidating related states or employing a state management library that offers a cleaner way to manage dependencies between states.

  3. Remove Debugging Code: It's generally advisable to remove console.log statements from production code. If logging is necessary, consider implementing a structured logging approach that can be toggled based on the environment.

  4. UI Components Abstraction: For UI patterns that recur, such as form fields with validation, creating abstracted components can reduce duplication and simplify the main component. This encapsulates common logic and styling, making the overall codebase more manageable.

By addressing these points, the code can be made more maintainable and easier to understand, enhancing its long-term scalability.

@@ -114,12 +115,19 @@ const AppReview = () => {
</div>
</div>
</ReviewComponent>
<ReviewComponent
title="Environment"
<ReviewComponent title="Nodepool Details" onEdit={() => {}}>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): The addition of the "Nodepool Details" section via a new ReviewComponent is well-integrated into the existing structure of the component. It adheres to the established patterns, maintaining consistency and readability, which is beneficial for future maintenance. The change is relatively isolated, focusing on adding new information without altering the logic of existing sections. This approach minimizes the risk of introducing bugs or complexities. The use of keyconstants for accessing specific data points is in line with how other data is managed within the component, ensuring a coherent development pattern. Overall, this update appears to enhance the component's functionality without significantly increasing its complexity.

@@ -436,6 +468,17 @@ const ManagedServiceLayout = () => {
const { project, account } = useParams();
const rootUrl = `/${account}/${project}/managed-services`;

const { cluster } = useOutletContext<IProjectContext>();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (llm): The addition of new logic for fetching and managing node pools significantly increases the complexity of this component. This includes more state variables, asynchronous data fetching, and additional UI logic for handling the selection of node pools. While these changes are necessary for the new functionality, there are opportunities to simplify the code and improve maintainability.

Consider abstracting the complex logic related to fetching and transforming node pool data into a custom hook. This would encapsulate the asynchronous operations and data processing, making the main component more focused on rendering and interaction logic. For example, a useNodePools hook could handle fetching, transforming, and filtering the node pools, exposing only the final data and loading states to the component.

Simplifying state management by reducing the number of state variables or centralizing their management can also help make the component easier to understand and reduce the potential for bugs. Additionally, consider lazy loading components or data that are not critical for the initial render to improve performance and reduce the initial load complexity.

By addressing these points, the component can be made more readable and easier to maintain, while still fulfilling its required functionality.

data: nodepoolData,
isLoading: nodepoolLoading,
error: nodepoolLoadingError,
} = useCustomSwr('/nodepools', async () => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): It's great to see the use of useCustomSwr for fetching nodepool data asynchronously. However, I recommend adding unit tests to ensure that the nodepool data is fetched correctly and handled properly in case of errors. This is crucial for the reliability of the feature allowing users to select nodepools.

@@ -550,6 +597,14 @@ const ManagedServiceLayout = () => {
},
});

const nodepools = useMapper(parseNodes(nodepoolData), (val) => ({
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): I noticed that you're filtering nodepools to only include those with a 'stateful' nodepoolStateType. It would be beneficial to include integration tests that verify the filtering logic works as expected, especially in scenarios with a mix of stateful and other types of nodepools.

@@ -166,6 +186,11 @@ const AppCompute = () => {
accName: val.accountName,
}));

const nodepools = useMapper(parseNodes(nodepoolData), (val) => ({
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The addition of nodepool selection in the app compute configuration is a significant feature. To ensure its robustness, unit tests should be added to verify that the nodepool selection is correctly passed to the app's spec. This includes testing the handling of the selected nodepool name and ensuring it's correctly applied.

@@ -114,12 +115,19 @@ const AppReview = () => {
</div>
</div>
</ReviewComponent>
<ReviewComponent
title="Environment"
<ReviewComponent title="Nodepool Details" onEdit={() => {}}>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): The inclusion of nodepool details in the app review step is a good addition. It would be beneficial to have end-to-end tests that cover the scenario of selecting a nodepool and verifying that this selection is accurately reflected in the review step. This ensures that the user's selection is correctly captured and displayed.

data: nodepoolData,
isLoading: nodepoolLoading,
error: nodepoolLoadingError,
} = useCustomSwr('/nodepools', async () => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): Ensure to handle loading and error states gracefully in the UI for a better user experience. This could include displaying loading indicators while the nodepools are being fetched and showing error messages if the fetch fails. Testing these scenarios to ensure they're handled correctly would be beneficial.

@nxtCoder19 nxtCoder19 changed the title KLO-125 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services KLO-128 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services Mar 4, 2024
@nxtcoder17 nxtcoder17 merged commit 165ed40 into main Mar 4, 2024
4 checks passed
@nxtcoder17 nxtcoder17 deleted the update/app-msvc branch March 4, 2024 14:02
abdheshnayak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
KLO-128 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services
tulsiojha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
KLO-128 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services
abdheshnayak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
KLO-128 : user should be able to select nodespool while creating application and project managed services
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[KLO-128] user should be able to select nodespool while creating application
2 participants