Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v1.0.2 #141

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

Release v1.0.2 #141

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

nxtcoder17
Copy link
Member

kloudlite release v1.0.2

@nxtcoder17 nxtcoder17 merged commit eec6356 into main Feb 14, 2024
16 checks passed
@nxtcoder17 nxtcoder17 deleted the release-v1.0.2 branch February 14, 2024 13:55
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2024

This automated comment suggests enhancements to the PR title and body to improve clarity and facilitate a quicker review

Title suggestion

Release v1.0.2: Add GHCR Image Deletion Workflow and Improve Reconciliation Logic
Reasons to update the title
  • Consider specifying the key features or fixes in the release.
  • The title could be more descriptive about the changes in v1.0.2.

Body suggestion

This release, v1.0.2, introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for deleting images from the GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) based on a specified tag. Additionally, we've made improvements to the reconciliation logic in our controllers, including retry mechanisms and enhanced status updates for managed services. These changes aim to enhance the stability and reliability of our operations.

Key Changes:
- Added `.github/workflows/delete-images-from-ghcr.yml` for GHCR image deletion.
- Improved error handling and requeue logic in `cluster-msvc` and `project-msvc` controllers to enhance resilience.

For more details on the changes and their impact, please refer to our documentation and issue tracker.
Reasons to update the body
  • Include a brief summary of the new features, bug fixes, or improvements.
  • Mention the addition of the GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) image deletion workflow.
  • Highlight the changes made to the reconciliation logic in the controllers.
  • Consider listing any known issues or limitations with this release.
  • It's helpful to include any relevant links to documentation or issue trackers.

Benefits of a great title and description

Author benefits

  • Faster Approval Times: Clear descriptions lead to quicker, more efficient code review processes.
  • Higher Quality Reviews: Well-crafted descriptions lead to more insightful feedback, improving the overall quality of the code.
  • Easier Future Maintenance: Simplifies debugging and updating code by providing context and rationale.

Reviewer benefits

  • Efficient Review Process: Concise, informative descriptions enable quicker understanding and assessment of changes.
  • Improved Decision-Making: Detailed context aids in evaluating the impact and necessity of the change.
  • Facilitates Knowledge Sharing: Offers insights into codebase evolution, design choices, and problem-solving approaches.

Guide: Writing good PR descriptions - Google

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: This pull request introduces enhancements across two main areas: automated container image deletion from GitHub Container Registry and resilience improvements in the microservice controllers. Specifically, it adds a new GitHub Actions workflow for deleting container images based on a specified tag and implements a requeue mechanism with a fixed delay for error handling in the microservice controllers.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Consider implementing a backoff strategy for the requeue mechanism to avoid potential rapid retry loops under certain failure conditions. This could enhance the resilience of the controllers by adapting the retry intervals based on the frequency and type of errors encountered.
  • Ensure that the external GitHub Action used for deleting container images is from a trusted source. Regularly review and update the dependencies to mitigate security risks associated with third-party actions. This is crucial for maintaining the security and reliability of the CI/CD pipeline.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

msvc.Spec = obj.Spec.MSVCSpec
return nil
}); err != nil {
return failed(err)
return failed(err).RequeueAfter(1 * time.Second)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): Introducing a requeue with a fixed delay upon failure is a good resilience pattern. However, consider if a backoff strategy might be more appropriate to avoid potential rapid retry loops under certain failure conditions.

runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Delete image
uses: bots-house/[email protected]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (llm): Using an external action (bots-house/[email protected]) for deleting images introduces a dependency on third-party code. Ensure that this action is from a trusted source and consider its maintenance and security posture.

abdheshnayak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant