Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add-moonbeam as GLMR evm #76

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Add-moonbeam as GLMR evm #76

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

MCysneiros
Copy link
Contributor

@MCysneiros MCysneiros commented Oct 17, 2024

Description

Please provide a brief summary of the changes. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have confirmed all checks make check

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced support for the Moonbeam blockchain with the addition of GLMROptions and GLMR chain.
    • Added methods for transaction handling, including signing, verifying, and sending transactions.
    • Enhanced transaction models to accommodate Moonbeam-specific options.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated transaction handling methods to ensure compatibility with the new Moonbeam variants.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded module documentation to include new functionalities related to the Moonbeam blockchain.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce support for the Moonbeam blockchain within the existing codebase. A new struct GLMROptions is added to manage Ethereum-related options, while the Chain enum is expanded to include a new variant for GLMR. Additionally, a new module for Moonbeam is created, which includes a GLMR struct and a Transaction struct for blockchain operations. Modifications to existing enums enhance compatibility with the new structures, ensuring that transaction handling and options management are integrated into the broader system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/kos-proto/src/options.rs Added GLMROptions struct with methods new, set_eth_options, and get_eth_options.
packages/kos-sdk/src/chain.rs Updated createChains! macro to include GLMR in the Chain enum.
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/mod.rs Added moonbeam module, exporting GLMR constant and GLMRTransaction type.
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Introduced GLMR struct and Transaction struct, along with various methods for blockchain ops.
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs Added Moonbeam variant to TransactionRaw and Options enums; updated get_raw and from_raw methods.

Poem

In the meadow where the moonbeams play,
A new struct hops in, hip-hip-hooray! 🌙
With options for Ethereum, oh what a sight,
GLMR joins the dance, shining so bright!
Transactions now flow with a flick of a paw,
In the world of chains, we leap and we draw! 🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/mod.rs (1)

19-19: LGTM: GLMRTransaction type exported correctly. Consider grouping imports.

The export of the GLMRTransaction type is consistent with the existing pattern for other blockchain transaction types. The naming convention follows the established standard.

As a minor optimization, consider grouping all transaction type imports together. You could move this line up to be right after the ETHTransaction import for better organization.

Here's a suggested regrouping:

 pub use ethereum::transaction::Transaction as ETHTransaction;
+pub use moonbeam::Transaction as GLMRTransaction;
 pub use polygon::Transaction as MATICTransaction;
-pub use moonbeam::Transaction as GLMRTransaction;

 pub use self::bitcoin::transaction::BTCTransaction;
packages/kos-proto/src/options.rs (1)

308-324: LGTM: GLMROptions implementation is consistent with existing patterns.

The implementation of GLMROptions follows the same pattern as MATICOptions, which ensures consistency across the codebase. The constructor and methods are correctly annotated with #[wasm_bindgen] for JavaScript interoperability.

Consider optimizing the set_eth_options() and get_eth_options() methods to avoid cloning if performance becomes a concern:

  1. For set_eth_options(), you could use mem::replace or mem::swap to avoid cloning.
  2. For get_eth_options(), you could return a reference instead of a clone if the ownership model allows it.

Example optimization for set_eth_options():

use std::mem;

#[wasm_bindgen(js_name = setETHOptions)]
pub fn set_eth_options(&mut self, options: ETHOptions) {
    mem::replace(&mut self.eth, options);
}

These optimizations should only be applied if profiling indicates that the current implementation is a performance bottleneck.

packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1)

160-164: Consider renaming gas_price to get_gas_price for consistency

The function is annotated with #[wasm_bindgen(js_name = "getGasPrice")], suggesting that it should correspond to a get_gas_price function in Rust. For consistency with other functions and to adhere to Rust naming conventions, consider renaming it.

Apply this diff:

-    pub async fn gas_price(node_url: Option<String>) -> Result<BigNumber, Error> {
+    pub async fn get_gas_price(node_url: Option<String>) -> Result<BigNumber, Error> {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67de250 and 65e6dc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/kos-proto/src/options.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/chain.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/mod.rs (3)

6-6: LGTM: Moonbeam module added correctly.

The addition of the moonbeam module is consistent with the PR objective and follows the existing pattern of module declarations. The alphabetical ordering is maintained, which is good for readability and organization.


14-14: LGTM: GLMR constant exported correctly.

The export of the GLMR constant from the moonbeam module is consistent with the existing pattern for other blockchain constants. The alphabetical ordering is maintained, which is good for consistency and readability.


6-6: Summary: Moonbeam integration looks good overall.

The changes to add Moonbeam support are well-integrated into the existing structure of the mod.rs file. The new module declaration, constant export, and transaction type export all follow the established patterns and naming conventions. These additions enhance the SDK's functionality by including Moonbeam blockchain support alongside other chains.

A minor suggestion for import grouping was made, but overall, the changes are consistent with the PR objective and maintain the code's organization and readability.

Also applies to: 14-14, 19-19

packages/kos-sdk/src/chain.rs (1)

158-158: Verify GLMR implementation and update documentation

The addition of GLMR to the createChains! macro expands the Chain enum and its associated methods. This change appears to be consistent with the existing pattern. However, please ensure the following:

  1. Verify that all necessary implementations for GLMR exist in the codebase, including the GLMR::base_chain() method and other required functionalities.
  2. Update any relevant documentation or comments to include GLMR in the list of supported chains.
  3. Check if this addition affects any other parts of the codebase that may rely on an exhaustive list of chains.

To verify the GLMR implementation, run the following script:

This script will help ensure that the GLMR implementation is complete and consistent with other chains in the codebase.

packages/kos-proto/src/options.rs (2)

301-306: LGTM: GLMROptions struct definition is consistent with existing patterns.

The GLMROptions struct is well-defined and follows the same pattern as the existing MATICOptions struct. The use of #[wasm_bindgen] and appropriate derive macros ensures consistency with other structs in the file and enables JavaScript interoperability.


301-324: Summary: GLMROptions successfully added, maintaining consistency with existing code.

The addition of GLMROptions struct and its implementation is well-integrated into the existing codebase. It follows the established patterns, particularly mirroring the structure of MATICOptions. This addition enhances the project's capability to handle Moonbeam (GLMR) blockchain options without introducing breaking changes or inconsistencies.

Key points:

  1. The new struct and implementation maintain code consistency.
  2. Proper use of #[wasm_bindgen] ensures JavaScript interoperability.
  3. The changes are isolated and don't affect other parts of the file.

This addition successfully achieves the PR objective of introducing Moonbeam network support for the GLMR token within the project's EVM options.

packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (2)

72-72: Addition of Moonbeam variant to TransactionRaw enum is appropriate

The new Moonbeam variant in the TransactionRaw enum correctly incorporates GLMRTransaction to support Moonbeam transactions.


84-84: Addition of Moonbeam variant to Options enum is appropriate

The new Moonbeam variant in the Options enum correctly includes GLMROptions to support options for Moonbeam transactions.

packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (2)

53-63: Ensure comprehensive transaction type handling in convert_transaction

The convert_transaction function handles conversions between transaction types but may not cover all possible cases. Ensure that all variants of TransactionRaw are appropriately managed to prevent runtime errors.

Review the convert_transaction logic to confirm that all transaction types are correctly handled, and consider adding unit tests for additional coverage.


185-194: ⚠️ Potential issue

Expose the broadcast function to JavaScript by adding #[wasm_bindgen] annotation

Similarly, the broadcast function is not annotated with #[wasm_bindgen], which means it cannot be called from JavaScript/WebAssembly environments.

Apply this diff to add the #[wasm_bindgen] annotation:

+    #[wasm_bindgen(js_name = "broadcast")]
     pub async fn broadcast(
         tx: models::Transaction,
         node_url: Option<String>,
     ) -> Result<BroadcastResult, Error> {
         let node = node_url.unwrap_or_else(|| crate::utils::get_node_url("GLMR"));
         let result = ETH::broadcast(tx, Some(node)).await?;
         Ok(BroadcastResult::new(convert_transaction(result.tx)?))
     }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65e6dc9 and 39190da.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (8)

1-41: LGTM: Imports and struct definitions are well-organized

The imports, struct definitions, and constant declarations are appropriate for implementing Moonbeam blockchain support. The use of #[wasm_bindgen] for the GLMR struct enables WebAssembly compatibility.


60-73: LGTM: Transaction conversion logic is sound

The convert_transaction function effectively handles the conversion between Moonbeam and Ethereum transaction types, maintaining consistency with Moonbeam's EVM compatibility. The error handling for invalid transaction types is appropriate.


236-258: LGTM: Test setup is well-structured

The test setup includes necessary imports, constants, and an init() function to set the NODE_GLMR environment variable. This structure provides a good foundation for the test cases.


394-427: LGTM: JSON decoding test is comprehensive

The test_decode_json function provides a thorough test for decoding a JSON-formatted transaction and verifying its structure. It covers important aspects such as chain ID, nonce, addresses, and other transaction details.


286-323: ⚠️ Potential issue

Initialize environment variables in test_send_and_sign

The test_send_and_sign function uses network resources but doesn't call the init() function to set up necessary environment variables. This may lead to test failures or inconsistent behavior.

Add a call to init() at the beginning of the test:

 #[test]
 fn test_send_and_sign() {
+    init();
     let options = models::SendOptions {
         // ... (rest of the test)
     };

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


325-371: ⚠️ Potential issue

Use init() function in test_send_erc20 to set environment variables

The test_send_erc20 function manually sets the NODE_GLMR environment variable. To ensure consistency and avoid duplication, use the init() function instead.

Replace the manual environment variable setting with a call to init():

 #[test]
 fn test_send_erc20() {
-    std::env::set_var("NODE_GLMR", "https://moonbeam.node.klever.io");
+    init();
     let options = models::SendOptions {
         // ... (rest of the test)
     };

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


175-193: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add #[wasm_bindgen] annotation to the send method

The send method is missing the #[wasm_bindgen] annotation, which is present on other methods in the GLMR implementation. This annotation is necessary for exposing the function to JavaScript/WebAssembly contexts.

Add the annotation as follows:

+    #[wasm_bindgen(js_name = "send")]
     pub async fn send(
         sender: String,
         receiver: String,
         amount: BigNumber,
         options: Option<models::SendOptions>,
         node_url: Option<String>,
     ) -> Result<models::Transaction, Error> {
         // ... (existing implementation)
     }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


1-427: Overall implementation is solid, consider additional verification

The Moonbeam implementation effectively leverages existing Ethereum functionality, which is appropriate given Moonbeam's EVM compatibility. The code is well-structured with comprehensive test coverage.

To ensure full compatibility:

  1. Verify that all Moonbeam-specific parameters (like gas prices, block times, etc.) are correctly set.
  2. Consider adding integration tests that interact with a Moonbeam testnet to validate the implementation in a live environment.

Run the following script to check for any Moonbeam-specific configurations:

✅ Verification successful

Moonbeam-specific configurations verified successfully

All Moonbeam-specific configurations and parameters are present in the codebase. No pending TODOs related to Moonbeam or GLMR were detected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Moonbeam-specific configurations and parameters

# Test: Search for Moonbeam-specific constants or configurations
rg -i 'moonbeam|glmr' --type rust

# Test: Check for any TODO comments related to Moonbeam implementation
rg -i 'todo.*moonbeam|glmr' --type rust

Length of output: 9043

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1)

23-23: Consider adding a comment for the CHAIN_ID constant

It would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining the significance of the CHAIN_ID value (1284) for Moonbeam. This enhances code readability and maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 39190da and 42e047c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs (1)

321-367: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use init() function in test_send_erc20 to set environment variables

Currently, test_send_erc20 manually sets the NODE_GLMR environment variable. To ensure consistency and avoid duplication, use the init() function instead.

Apply this diff:

 fn test_send_erc20() {
-    std::env::set_var("NODE_GLMR", "https://moonbeam.node.klever.io");
+    init();
     let options = models::SendOptions {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/moonbeam/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@pedrxlz pedrxlz closed this Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants