Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 🐞 hiddem Max Amount for new ID #352

Merged

Conversation

saviojks
Copy link
Contributor

@saviojks saviojks commented Dec 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Novos Recursos
    • Melhoria na lógica de renderização do componente AssetTrigger, controlando a visibilidade do campo de entrada "Max Amount for new ID" com base em um novo estado monitorado.

@saviojks saviojks self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

As mudanças introduzidas no componente AssetTrigger em src/components/TransactionForms/CustomForms/AssetTrigger.tsx incluem a adição de uma nova variável chamada watchCollectionAssetId, que utiliza a função watch do useFormContext para monitorar o valor de collectionAssetId. Essa variável é incorporada na lógica de renderização condicional da função getMintForm, atualizando a condição para exibir o campo "Max Amount for new ID". A estrutura geral do componente permanece inalterada, com foco na melhoria da lógica condicional.

Changes

Arquivo Resumo da Mudança
src/components/TransactionForms/CustomForms/AssetTrigger.tsx Adicionada a variável watchCollectionAssetId e atualizada a lógica de renderização na função getMintForm para incluir essa nova variável.

Poem

🐰 Em um campo de flores a brilhar,
O AssetTrigger começa a dançar,
Com watchCollectionAssetId a espreitar,
O campo oculto agora vai brilhar!
Condições ajustadas, tudo em seu lugar,
Com lógica nova, vamos celebrar! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/TransactionForms/CustomForms/AssetTrigger.tsx (1)

119-122: Sugestão de melhoria na legibilidade da condição

A lógica condicional atual, embora funcional, pode ser difícil de manter devido às múltiplas condições encadeadas.

Considere extrair a condição para uma variável com nome descritivo:

-      {!collection.isNFT &&
-      !collection.isFungible &&
-      !hasInternalId &&
-      !watchCollectionAssetId ? (
+      {const shouldShowMaxAmount = !collection.isNFT && 
+         !collection.isFungible && 
+         !hasInternalId && 
+         !watchCollectionAssetId;
+       
+       shouldShowMaxAmount ? (

Isso tornaria o código mais legível e facilitaria o entendimento da regra de negócio.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 769ad70 and 6f4a136.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/TransactionForms/CustomForms/AssetTrigger.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/TransactionForms/CustomForms/AssetTrigger.tsx (1)

106-107: Implementação correta do hook watch!

A utilização do hook watch do useFormContext para monitorar as mudanças no campo collectionAssetId está adequada e segue as boas práticas do React Hook Form.

@saviojks saviojks merged commit aab4206 into develop Dec 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@saviojks saviojks deleted the LAB-2901-nft-asset-id-not-avaiable-to-input-on-testnet-2 branch December 13, 2024 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants