-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PR: demo with change order sign and Unit-Test #66
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…Approach to execution transaction
…ssion Over Target Safe
…uard in Sepolia, with new approach of ExecutionOnBehalf for Demo
…half-method ADD: first draft new approach execution On Behalf, aligned with Safe Approach to execution transaction
…ehalf with different order in the signatures
…half-method FIX: adjust for Run Unit-Test in Fork-Polygon
jozer-rami
changed the title
PR: pr demo with chang in sign and Unit-Test
PR: demo with change order sign and Unit-Test
Mar 25, 2024
jozer-rami
reviewed
Mar 25, 2024
.env.example
Outdated
### Keyper Contracts deployed | ||
# # Kovan deployed versions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kovan or sepolia?
script/SkipExecutionOnBehalf.s.sol
Outdated
Comment on lines
15
to
25
// testCannot_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_Wrapper_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_ChildSquad_over_RootSafe_With_SAFE(); // ✅ | ||
// testCannot_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_Wrapper_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_ChildSquad_over_RootSafe_With_EOA(); // ??? | ||
// testCan_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_ROOT_SAFE_as_SAFE_is_TARGETS_ROOT_SameTree(); // ✅ | ||
// testCan_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_as_EOA_is_NOT_ROLE_with_RIGHTS_SIGNATURES(); // ✅ | ||
// testCan_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_SUPER_SAFE_as_SAFE_is_TARGETS_LEAD_SameTree(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevert_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_as_EOA_is_NOT_ROLE_with_WRONG_SIGNATURES(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevert_ExecTransactionOnBehalf_as_EOA_is_NOT_ROLE_with_INVALID_SIGNATURES(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevertInvalidSignatureExecOnBehalf(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevertInvalidAddressProvidedExecTransactionOnBehalfScenarioOne(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevertZeroAddressProvidedExecTransactionOnBehalfScenarioTwo(); // ✅ | ||
// testRevertSuperSafeExecOnBehalf(); // ✅ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to add a comment why we're disabling this tests
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.