-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: try disabling concurrency for browserstack tests #7258
chore: try disabling concurrency for browserstack tests #7258
Conversation
We're still getting sporadic test failures with BrowserStack. So per one discussion online, attempting to run without concurrency to see if it improves stability. I note that the video from tests where we "fail to capture" shows a browser with an error: "Safari Can't Connect to the Server" "Safari can't open the page "localhost:9879/?id=75185158" because Safari can't connect to the server "localhost". https://automate.browserstack.com/dashboard/v2/builds/419c59decb8e12303e45e1f4bad1b945252df532/sessions/19712158833ce57592b66a50433965e4146fc972
User Test ResultsTest specification and instructions User tests are not required Test Artifacts
|
Additional ref: Suggestions that multiple CI sessions overlapping may also cause the issue? |
I've just analyzed the 50 most recent builds in both LM and web test builds and there is weak evidence that build overlap may be contributing to the failures? Last column show build overlap. We might not see all overlaps fail, but there do seem to be more failures when there is overlap.
|
AFAICT, this has not made a difference to stability. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Yeah, that's been my running hypothesis. Build overlap definitely wouldn't be doing us any favors for test stability. I hadn't found any concrete references for that running theory, though. |
I found two somewhat-related refs, neither conclusive, but both suggestive:
We're certainly not the only people experiencing instability with BrowserStack + Karma, going by that first ref above! |
Changes in this pull request will be available for download in Keyman version 16.0.61-alpha |
We're still getting sporadic test failures with BrowserStack. So per one discussion online, attempting to run without concurrency to see if it improves stability.
I note that the video from tests where we "fail to capture" shows a browser with an error: "Safari Can't Connect to the Server" "Safari can't open the page "localhost:9879/?id=75185158" because Safari can't connect to the server "localhost".
https://automate.browserstack.com/dashboard/v2/builds/419c59decb8e12303e45e1f4bad1b945252df532/sessions/19712158833ce57592b66a50433965e4146fc972
Browserstack log entries from the build in question:
@keymanapp-test-bot skip