Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator tempo-operator (0.14.2) #5384

Conversation

tempooperatorbot
Copy link
Contributor

Release tempo-operator 0.14.2.

cc @pavolloffay @frzifus @andreasgerstmayr @rubenvp8510 @iblancasa

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@andreasgerstmayr,@rubenvp8510,@iblancasa,@frzifus,@pavolloffay , please approve as you are original reviewer(s).

  • To add more contributors to ci.yaml follow instruction here.
  • To approve follow instruction here

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Update the tempo to 0.14.2 operator tempo-operator (0.14.2) Dec 2, 2024
@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

1 similar comment
@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation framework-automation merged commit fafd783 into k8s-operatorhub:main Dec 2, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants