Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] tick off constraint programming from roadmap #3635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2023
Merged

[docs] tick off constraint programming from roadmap #3635

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/src/developers/roadmap.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ represent broad themes that we see as areas in which JuMP could be improved.
Since the very beginning, JuMP has hard-coded the coefficient type as
`Float64`. This has made it impossible to support solvers which can use other
types such as `BigFloat` or `Rational{BigInt}`.
- Add support for constraint programming:
- **Done [#3385](https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/pull/3635)** Add support for constraint programming:
[https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/issues/2227](https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/issues/2227)
JuMP has a strong focus on linear, conic and nonlinear optimization problems.
We want to add better support for constraint programming.
Expand Down
Loading