Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test[isReadonlyOf]: test with isObjectOf with symbol properties #108

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

Milly
Copy link
Collaborator

@Milly Milly commented Aug 8, 2024

Only tests.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.99%. Comparing base (56b24ed) to head (f2d4900).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           symbol-properties-wip     #108   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                  97.99%   97.99%           
======================================================
  Files                         50       50           
  Lines                        797      797           
  Branches                      85       85           
======================================================
  Hits                         781      781           
  Misses                        16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Milly Milly requested a review from lambdalisue August 8, 2024 18:31
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Please merge it by yourself 👍

@Milly Milly force-pushed the symbol-properties-wip branch from 56b24ed to 093cdbe Compare August 8, 2024 19:02
@Milly Milly merged commit ae13e2f into symbol-properties-wip Aug 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@Milly Milly deleted the symbol-properties/readonly-of branch August 8, 2024 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants