Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

channels/Common: only allocate temp buffers for read and write if nec… #49

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
27 changes: 19 additions & 8 deletions src/main/java/jnr/enxio/channels/Common.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,13 +44,19 @@ int getFD() {

int read(ByteBuffer dst) throws IOException {

ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(dst.remaining());
int n;
if (!dst.hasArray() && !dst.isDirect()) {
Copy link
Contributor

@huntc huntc Nov 24, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do this additional check at all? Why not call Native.read directly with dst. I can't see why the new allocation is required even for non-direct mode. Native.read appears to be agnostic to the type of byte buffer, and if there is something to be done, then the JNI call-site is the best place for those concerns.

ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(dst.remaining());

int n = Native.read(_fd, buffer);
n = Native.read(_fd, buffer);

buffer.flip();
buffer.flip();

dst.put(buffer);
} else {
n = Native.read(_fd, dst);
}

dst.put(buffer);

switch (n) {
case 0:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -92,13 +98,18 @@ long read(ByteBuffer[] dsts, int offset, int length)

int write(ByteBuffer src) throws IOException {

ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(src.remaining());
int n;
if (!src.hasArray() && !src.isDirect()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As per my comment for read.

ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(src.remaining());

buffer.put(src);
buffer.put(src);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is incorrect as per #50 as the src position is updated to limit, which it should be updated by n (bytes written)


buffer.position(0);
buffer.position(0);

int n = Native.write(_fd, buffer);
n = Native.write(_fd, buffer);
} else {
n = Native.write(_fd, src);
}

if (n < 0) {
switch (Native.getLastError()) {
Expand Down