Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

git: on abandoning unreachable commits, don't count HEAD ref #4143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

yuja
Copy link
Contributor

@yuja yuja commented Jul 24, 2024

This basically reverts 20eb9ec "git: don't abandon HEAD commit when it loses a branch." I think the new behavior is more consistent because the Git HEAD is equivalent to @- in jj, so it shouldn't be considered a named ref.

Note that we've made old HEAD branch not considered at 92cfffd "git: on external HEAD move, do not abandon old branch."

#4108

Checklist

If applicable:

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.md
  • I have updated the documentation (README.md, docs/, demos/)
  • I have updated the config schema (cli/src/config-schema.json)
  • I have added tests to cover my changes

This basically reverts 20eb9ec "git: don't abandon HEAD commit when it
loses a branch." I think the new behavior is more consistent because the Git
HEAD is equivalent to @- in jj, so it shouldn't be considered a named ref.

Note that we've made old HEAD branch not considered at 92cfffd "git: on
external HEAD move, do not abandon old branch."

jj-vcs#4108
Copy link
Member

@martinvonz martinvonz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@yuja yuja merged commit bafb357 into jj-vcs:main Jul 24, 2024
17 checks passed
@yuja yuja deleted the push-mymvopztvrkn branch July 24, 2024 12:22
PhilipMetzger added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
This applies some suggestions from Ilya from #4143 and starts to differentiate in terminology.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants