cli: move: Add -f/-t for --from/--to to jj move

[poliorcetics]

I find myself often using jj move when working and having shorthands for --from/--to would be very useful

Checklist

If applicable:

• I have updated CHANGELOG.md
• I have updated the documentation (README.md, docs/, demos/)
• I have updated the config schema (cli/src/config-schema.json)
• I have added tests to cover my changes (modified existing one)

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[arxanas]

Be advised that -f may conflict with a future --force option, should we choose to add one in the future.

[thoughtpolice]

Be advised that -f may conflict with a future --force option, should we choose to add one in the future.

I almost wonder if we want to call them --source and --dest instead, to match what we do in jj rebase. -s and -d are relatively uncommon and it would be a little more "symmetrical." Then we would keep -f free. Just a thought.

[yuja]

This seems also related: #2882

[poliorcetics]

I can rename to --source/--dest and associated shorthands if preferred

[martinvonz]

I can rename to --source/--dest and associated shorthands if preferred

I think this PR is good as is. Whether we rename the flags seems like a separate discussion that shouldn't block this.

I almost wonder if we want to call them --source and --dest instead, to match what we do in jj rebase. -s and -d are relatively uncommon and it would be a little more "symmetrical." Then we would keep -f free. Just a thought.

--from and --to also seem very symmetrical, don't they? We also have jj diff to compare to, and -s/-d seem to make less sense there. That said, I'm not completely against naming these flags more in line with jj rebase than jj diff.

This seems also related: #2882

Yes.

[martinvonz]

Be advised that -f may conflict with a future --force option, should we choose to add one in the future.

I generally avoid --force unless it's obvious what's being forced. I think there's usually a clearer name (--allow-conflicts or whatever is relevant). There may be several ways to force things in a single command.

[poliorcetics]

Fixed the conflict in the changelog