-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge_tools: pass Matcher
in for interactive use
#2129
Conversation
d1435a2
to
dd71103
Compare
4e3836e
to
d3da8c0
Compare
40f849a
to
ec659af
Compare
63dcbe2
to
99ce2e1
Compare
ec659af
to
094e1a2
Compare
094e1a2
to
ec3b821
Compare
99ce2e1
to
ea5692a
Compare
ea5692a
to
7187403
Compare
2ef1ab8
to
e30461f
Compare
393dfb2
to
fa8e659
Compare
e30461f
to
7f8347d
Compare
Re commit message: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry to keep this waiting, I don't know why I had not approved this earlier
7f8347d
to
b48e124
Compare
fa8e659
to
d6e9d09
Compare
For `jj split --interactive`, the user will want to select changes from a subset of files. This means that we need to pass the `Matcher` object when materializing the list of changed files. I also updated the parameter lists so that the matcher always immediately follows the tree objects.
@ilyagr do you have a suggestion for an alternate commit message? |
@arxanas My first thought is to replace If you don't like that and nothing else comes to mind, feel free to leave as is. |
b1eefb3
to
04d2217
Compare
@ilyagr Okay, so looking back at it, the reason I added |
Checklist
If applicable:
CHANGELOG.md