-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: get the baseRefSha from graphql to reduce rate consumption #1580
fix: get the baseRefSha from graphql to reduce rate consumption #1580
Conversation
Hi @Skisocks. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a jenkins-x member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. |
/cc @tomhobson @msvticket |
/ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: msvticket The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
14 similar comments
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
17 similar comments
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
Failed to merge this PR due to:
|
We can get the pull requests
baseRefSha
from the graphql query, this should reduce the rate limit usage as we no longer need to hit the rest api for every PR returned by the initial graphql query. This also reduces the rate consumption for scms that don't support graphql asbaseRefSha
is already found in the initial rest query.