Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(fix): jest config parsing shouldn't silently fail on error #499

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2020

Conversation

agilgur5
Copy link
Collaborator

@agilgur5 agilgur5 commented Feb 7, 2020

  • before if your jest.config.js had an error in it, the try/catch would
    just ignore it and pretend like your jest.config.js didn't exist

    • this caused me a lot of confusion as to why my customizations
      seemingly weren't being read at all
  • instead of try/catching a MODULE_NOT_FOUND, check if it exists first,
    and only then do parsing

    • and let it throw an error if there is one, don't cover it up

Ran into this while making agilgur5/react-signature-canvas#42 as well, specifically agilgur5/react-signature-canvas@8f124fe

Related to #483 which also had a silent parsing error due to an overbroad try/catch -- should really remove those from the codebase as they cause lots of confusing headaches to users

- before if your jest.config.js had an error in it, the try/catch would
  just ignore it and pretend like your jest.config.js didn't exist
  - this caused me a lot of confusion as to why my customizations
    seemingly weren't being read at all

- instead of try/catching a MODULE_NOT_FOUND, check if it exists first,
  and only then do parsing
  - and let it throw an error if there is one, don't cover it up
@agilgur5 agilgur5 changed the title (fix): jest config parsing shouldn't silently ignore errors (fix): jest config parsing shouldn't silently fail on error Feb 7, 2020
@swyxio swyxio merged commit a97a5af into jaredpalmer:master Feb 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants