Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that a process-level crypto provider exists #822

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

paulgb
Copy link
Member

@paulgb paulgb commented Oct 8, 2024

rustls requires a process-level CryptoProvider be setup. We already do this in dynamic-proxy, which is why those tests pass, but we do not do it in Plane itself so it sometimes fails.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
plane ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 8, 2024 1:37pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new dependency to the Cargo.toml file for the plane package, specifically adding the rustls crate at version "0.23.14". This addition expands the project's dependency set, likely enabling enhanced security features related to TLS (Transport Layer Security) through the Rustls library. Additionally, a modification is made in the main function of the plane/src/main.rs file, where a new line is added to call rustls::crypto::ring::default_provider().install_default();. This line is executed after initializing tracing and before invoking the run function with parsed options, indicating a change in the cryptographic provider setup to ensure the default provider from the rustls library is installed. No other modifications to existing dependencies or package metadata are present, nor are there any changes to the logic or control flow in the source code.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update dependency versions #820: The changes in this PR involve updates to the Cargo.toml file, which is directly related to the addition of the rustls dependency in the main PR, as both involve modifications to the project's dependencies.

Suggested reviewers

  • rolyatmax
  • michaelsilver

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plane/Cargo.toml (1)

36-36: LGTM! Consider using a caret version requirement.

The addition of the rustls dependency is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives to establish a process-level CryptoProvider. This change is consistent with the project's use of other security-related crates.

Consider using a caret (^) version requirement for more flexible dependency management:

-rustls = "0.23.14"
+rustls = "^0.23.14"

This allows for compatible updates within the 0.23.x range, potentially including bug fixes and minor improvements.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 656013a and f51010e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • plane/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • plane/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plane/src/main.rs (1)

89-90: Approve the crypto provider installation with suggestions for improvement

The addition of rustls::crypto::ring::default_provider().install_default(); addresses the PR objective of establishing a process-level CryptoProvider. This should resolve the issue with certificate loading timing and allow tests to pass.

However, there are a couple of points to consider:

  1. Error handling: The result of the installation is currently ignored. Consider adding error handling to catch and log any potential issues during the installation process.

  2. Logging: It might be beneficial to add a log statement indicating that the crypto provider has been successfully installed.

Here's a suggested improvement:

match rustls::crypto::ring::default_provider().install_default() {
    Ok(_) => tracing::info!("Default crypto provider installed successfully"),
    Err(e) => tracing::error!("Failed to install default crypto provider: {}", e),
}

To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:

This script will run the test suite and check for any panics or errors related to the crypto provider in the logs. Please review the results to ensure that the tests are passing and there are no unhandled errors.

@paulgb paulgb merged commit 40ce6e0 into main Oct 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@paulgb paulgb deleted the paulgb/crypto-provider branch October 8, 2024 14:48
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants