Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ backend, eai add maven release #681

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

simonhir
Copy link
Member

@simonhir simonhir commented Jan 8, 2025

Description

Configure eai and backend for maven-release.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Configuration Updates
    • Added dynamic GitHub repository URL configuration
    • Introduced Maven release plugin (version 3.1.1)
    • Configured automatic versioning for submodules
    • Disabled default deployment for Maven projects

@simonhir simonhir self-assigned this Jan 8, 2025
@simonhir simonhir requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 13:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces consistent modifications to the pom.xml files in both refarch-backend and refarch-eai projects. These changes focus on enhancing build and release management by adding dynamic GitHub repository URL references, introducing a Maven release plugin version property, and configuring plugins for automated submodule versioning and deployment skipping. The modifications standardize project configuration across these repositories.

Changes

File Change Summary
refarch-backend/pom.xml - Added dynamic GitHub repository URL
- Introduced Maven release plugin version property
- Added Maven release plugin with auto-versioning
- Added Maven deploy plugin to skip deployment
- Removed Jacoco plugin configuration
refarch-eai/pom.xml - Added dynamic GitHub repository URL
- Introduced Maven release plugin version property
- Added Maven release plugin with auto-versioning
- Added Maven deploy plugin to skip deployment
- Retained Jacoco plugin

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through Maven's domain,
Plugins dance, release's refrain,
URLs dynamic, versions align,
Deployment skips with a clever design,
CodeRabbit's build, a rhythmic gain! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Template: Backend Issues regarding the backend template. Template: EAI Issues regarding the eai template. Type: Feature The issue is an feature labels Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
refarch-backend/pom.xml (1)

372-377: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding autoVersionSubmodules configuration

While the basic configuration is good, consider adding autoVersionSubmodules for better multi-module project support.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcfcccc and 4746d9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • refarch-backend/pom.xml (4 hunks)
  • refarch-eai/pom.xml (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
refarch-eai/pom.xml (3)

18-18: LGTM! Good use of GitHub environment variables for project URL.

The dynamic URL configuration using GitHub environment variables is a good practice for maintaining consistent project metadata.


45-46: Verify Maven release plugin version compatibility

The specified version 3.1.1 needs verification as it appears to be a future version compared to the current latest stable version 3.0.1.


198-204: Verify deployment strategy

The deployment is being skipped. Please confirm if this aligns with your deployment strategy and if there's an alternative deployment method in place (e.g., GitHub Packages, custom deployment scripts).

✅ Verification successful

Deployment strategy verified

The maven-deploy-plugin skip configuration is correct as deployments are handled by GitHub Actions workflows that:

  • Publish to Maven Central via Sonatype
  • Build and publish container images
  • Create GitHub releases
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for alternative deployment configurations
rg -l "deployment|publish|registry" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of workflow files
echo "=== maven-node-build.yaml ==="
cat .github/workflows/maven-node-build.yaml
echo -e "\n=== release-maven-image.yaml ==="
cat .github/workflows/release-maven-image.yaml

Length of output: 4300

refarch-backend/pom.xml (3)

17-17: LGTM! Good use of GitHub environment variables for project URL.

The dynamic URL configuration using GitHub environment variables is a good practice for maintaining consistent project metadata.

Note: Based on previous feedback, please ensure to test the URL resolution in your CI/CD environment.


44-46: Verify Maven release plugin version compatibility

The specified version 3.1.1 needs verification as it appears to be a future version compared to the current latest stable version 3.0.1.


378-384: Verify deployment strategy

The deployment is being skipped. Please confirm if this aligns with your deployment strategy and if there's an alternative deployment method in place.

refarch-eai/pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>refarch_eai</name>
<description>This is the default starting project for a EAI project based on the reference architecture of it@M</description>
<url>${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}</url>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just looked inside the generated jar inside the CI where still the env var placeholders are present, which for me means this doesn't work at all.

The original change came from #423 (comment) scm attribute

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hupling you there said you tested that but i think you only meant, that the CI succeeds and that you tested if it correctly is replaced in the POM right?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, i tested only the update of the pom.

you may need to adjust something, if you want to deploy to maven central. @sfi2022 had some problems because url and other stuff were missing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Template: Backend Issues regarding the backend template. Template: EAI Issues regarding the eai template. Type: Feature The issue is an feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants