Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: e2e test for hamt-sharded directory content #157

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

@SgtPooki SgtPooki commented Mar 25, 2024

Title

test: e2e test for hamt-sharded directory content

Description

adds "Opening UnixFS file from HAMT-sharded directory" test from #134

Notes & open questions

N/A

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if necessary (this includes comments as well)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (4304333) to head (cf44e20).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #157   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           35        35           
  Branches         5         5           
=========================================
  Hits            35        35           
Flag Coverage Δ
node 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SgtPooki SgtPooki merged commit 9874354 into main Mar 26, 2024
20 checks passed
@SgtPooki SgtPooki deleted the test/e2e-hamt branch March 26, 2024 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants