Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #30 from iotaledger/(upcoming)-meeting/2020-09-09
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
meeting/2020-09-09)
  • Loading branch information
Jelle Femmo Millenaar authored Sep 10, 2020
2 parents 3f6f228 + 879967b commit 718f12f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 68 additions and 5 deletions.
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions docs/meeting-notes/2020-09-09.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# 🗓️ Team Identity Meeting Notes - 2020-09-09

## 👥 Participants
- @Thoralf-M
- @nothingismagick
- @tensor-programming
- @JelleMillenaar
- @l1h3r

## 💬 Discussion topics
- Standup
- Fragment Name Uniqueness
- Working Group participation
- LD Proof Scope: Merkle Tree
- Questions
- Account required data and module implementation

### Standup

#### What was last week's progress on your project?
- Worked on a library for handling LD Proofs and credential verfication (PR open). Looked at DIDcomm
- Worked on the Proc macro for the Diff library - almost finished.
- Dereferencing part for the resolver + resolver itself
- Started writing the MethodSpec for W3C. Researched DIDcomm enviroment. Looking at DID Auth + NOISE.
- Discovered existing DIDComm Spec and add facts to presentation.


#### What will be the project's focus this week?
- Continue with the resolver-
- finish debugging the proc macro and move on to the account module.
- Continue MethodSpec. Kickstart P2P Comms Layer.
- Add some `jsonwebtoken`-based signature suites and look at SIOP DID-
- Start to write DIDComm as Spec and in Code for experimental purposes-

### Fragment Name Uniqueness
Question: Do we check for name uniqueness and throw an error?
([issue here](https://github.com/iotaledger/identity.rs/issues/29))
- Figure out when a fragment reference is legal
- Add a function to check if all fragments are unique
- Execute function when adding a new object to a DID Document
- Leave additional checks up to the implementer (Call the function manually)

### Questions
Q: Can our current Proof implementation handle extra logic such as putting the data through a merkle tree?
A: Yes

Q: Can we run our signature logic within Stronghold?
A: Most likely without too much hassle.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion docs/meeting-notes/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
# Meeting Notes

## Next Meeting
Wednesday, 2020-09-09 - 17:00 to 18:00 (CEST)
Wednesday, 2020-09-16 - 17:00 to 18:00 (CEST)

## Past Meetings
- [2020-09-09](./2020-09-09.md)
- [2020-09-02](./2020-09-02.md)
- [2020-08-19](./2020-08-19.md)
- [2020-08-12](./2020-08-12.md)
Expand Down
22 changes: 18 additions & 4 deletions docs/meeting-notes/_template.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# 🗓️ Team Identity Meeting Notes - 2020-xx-xx
# 🗓️ Team Identity Meeting Notes - 2020-09-09

## 👥 Participants
- @Thoralf-M
Expand All @@ -7,14 +7,28 @@
- @tensor-programming
- @JelleMillenaar
- @huhn511

- @l1h3r

## 💬 Discussion topics
- Standup
- Questions
-



### Standup

#### What was last week's progress on your project?
-
-

## 🎯 Goals
-

#### What will be the project's focus this week?
-
-
-

### Questions

Q:
A:

0 comments on commit 718f12f

Please sign in to comment.