Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring tile-consumer-and-fuse-producers pass from TPP #195

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dchigarev
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Chigarev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dchigarev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dchigarev <[email protected]>
@ZhennanQin
Copy link
Contributor

ZhennanQin commented Jul 30, 2024

I suggest reusing the CPU implementation from #87, which would do a similar transformation. Would you please discuss with @Yun-Fly which kind of transformation do you require and he can enable that in that PR.

@Yun-Fly
Copy link
Contributor

Yun-Fly commented Jul 30, 2024

I suggest reusing the CPU implementation from #87, which would do a similar transformation. Would you please discuss with @Yun-Fly which kind of transformation do you require and he can enable that in that PR.

+1, Agree with @ZhennanQin.

In CPU pipeline, we have enabled a new fusion pass, which has more fusion capability than tile-consumer-and-fuse-producers. You can refer to #87 for more information.

If you have any questions about this, please let me know.

BTW, the example you illustrated looks more like a tiling process instead of fusion, because there are no other ops except for matmul.

@dchigarev dchigarev closed this Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bring tile-consumer-and-fuse-producers pass from TPP
3 participants