Test coxph

[shajoezhu]

══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Failure ('test-coxph.R:56:3'): try_car_anova works correctly ────────────────
Snapshot of code has changed:
old vs new
Code
res
Output

• [1] 1.0000000 1.0000000 0.9678110 0.3970066 0.3252267 0.5286392

• [1] 1.0000000 0.7521316 0.3858022

• Run testthat::snapshot_accept('coxph') to accept the change.
• Run testthat::snapshot_review('coxph') to interactively review the change.

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

    1 files     84 suites   1m 14s ⏱️
  870 tests   858 ✅  12 💤 0 ❌
1 866 runs  1 170 ✅ 696 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 55af51e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
analyze_vars_in_cols	💔	$2.35$	$+3.25$	$+17$	$-7$	$0$	$0$
count_occurrences	💔	$0.71$	$+1.60$	$+10$	$-8$	$0$	$0$
count_occurrences_by_grade	💔	$1.72$	$+1.02$	$+16$	$-17$	$0$	$0$
summarize_coxreg	💔	$3.70$	$+2.57$	$+13$	$-13$	$0$	$0$
summarize_num_patients	💔	$1.05$	$+1.23$	$+18$	$-16$	$0$	$0$

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
analyze_vars_in_cols	💔	$0.46$	$+1.49$	summarize_works_with_nested_analyze
summarize_coxreg	💔	$0.59$	$+1.30$	summarize_coxreg_adds_the_multivariate_Cox_regression_layer_to_rtables

Results for commit ac9def2

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      65       0  100.00%
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        55       5  90.91%   93-97
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           116       3  97.41%   263-265
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   60       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  43       0  100.00%
R/analyze_variables.R                        175       2  98.86%   497, 637
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                     176      13  92.61%   178, 221, 235-236, 244-252
R/bland_altman.R                              92       1  98.91%   46
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                         84       2  97.62%   257, 316
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    10       0  100.00%
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          59       1  98.31%   74
R/count_missed_doses.R                        36       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R               157       2  98.73%   177, 271
R/count_occurrences.R                        116       1  99.14%   120
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   60
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 62       1  98.39%   123
R/count_patients_with_flags.R                 95       1  98.95%   134
R/count_values.R                              27       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     154       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression.R                           161       0  100.00%
R/coxph.R                                    167       7  95.81%   191-195, 238, 253, 261, 267-268
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            113       0  100.00%
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     621      64  89.69%   53, 88-89, 125-126, 129, 199, 223-232, 264, 266, 286, 290, 294, 298, 353, 356, 359, 362, 422, 430, 439, 444-447, 454, 457, 466, 469, 516-517, 519-520, 522-523, 525-526, 593, 604-616, 620, 663, 676, 680
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  50       1  98.00%   65
R/estimate_proportion.R                      205      11  94.63%   83-90, 94, 99, 320, 486
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/formatting_functions.R                     183       2  98.91%   141, 276
R/g_forest.R                                 585      60  89.74%   240, 252-255, 260-261, 275, 277, 287-290, 335-338, 345, 414, 501, 514, 518-519, 524-525, 538, 554, 601, 632, 707, 716, 722, 741, 796-816, 819, 830, 849, 904, 907, 1042-1047
R/g_ipp.R                                    133       0  100.00%
R/g_km.R                                     350      57  83.71%   285-288, 307-309, 363-366, 400, 428, 432-475, 482-486
R/g_lineplot.R                               260      22  91.54%   204, 378-385, 424-434, 543, 551
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   108
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        73       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    46       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_incidence_rate.R                          45       0  100.00%
R/h_km.R                                     509      41  91.94%   137, 189-194, 287, 378, 380-381, 392-394, 413, 420-421, 423-425, 433-435, 460, 465-468, 651-654, 1108-1119
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   203-204, 273
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  54       0  100.00%
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           90      12  86.67%   50-55, 107-112
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     178      18  89.89%   257-270, 329-334
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        64       1  98.44%   89
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           88       6  93.18%   111-116
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            207      18  91.30%   259-271, 336-341
R/imputation_rule.R                           17       0  100.00%
R/incidence_rate.R                            86       7  91.86%   67-72, 152
R/logistic_regression.R                      102       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   32, 66, 76
R/odds_ratio.R                               117       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            91       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                265      15  94.34%   70-73, 105, 290-297, 440, 605
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57       0  100.00%
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             69       6  91.30%   196-201
R/response_subgroups.R                       213       8  96.24%   100-105, 260-261
R/riskdiff.R                                  65       5  92.31%   102-105, 114
R/rtables_access.R                            38       0  100.00%
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   124
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      59       0  100.00%
R/summarize_ancova.R                         106       2  98.11%   183, 188
R/summarize_change.R                          74       1  98.65%   184
R/summarize_colvars.R                         10       0  100.00%
R/summarize_coxreg.R                         172       0  100.00%
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      238       8  96.64%   207-208, 401-405, 538
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    93       4  95.70%   117-119, 266
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       96       1  98.96%   56
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             78       6  92.31%   117-122
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   84      12  85.71%   51-52, 64-73
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              211       6  97.16%   124-129
R/survival_time.R                            111       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       124      10  91.94%   131-140
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_default_stats_formats_labels.R       157       0  100.00%
R/utils_factor.R                             109       2  98.17%   84, 302
R/utils_ggplot.R                             110       0  100.00%
R/utils_grid.R                               126       5  96.03%   164, 279-286
R/utils_rtables.R                            124       9  92.74%   39, 46, 403-404, 526-530
R/utils_split_funs.R                          52       2  96.15%   82, 94
R/utils.R                                    141       7  95.04%   118, 121, 124, 128, 137-138, 332
TOTAL                                      10834     478  95.59%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 55af51e

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results