-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
624 PACKAGE LEVEL pre-release activities #639
Conversation
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: 92bdf31 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 6 suites 0s ⏱️ Results for commit 92bdf31. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Co-authored-by: kartikeya kirar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
Closes #642. Removed `substitute_q` and `extract_input`. Added `@keywords internal` to `is_num_var_short`.
Part of #624 From this #624 (comment) #### Changes description - Adds `@return` tag to `shared_params` to be reused across all documentation - Corrects linter errors
# Pull Request - Fixes #686 - Part of #624 #### Changes descriptions - Adds missing assertions described on #686 - Adds a helper function called `assert_single_selection` - Avoids many repetitive calls across functions to check for multiple selections - Adds simple unit tests - Adds some comments to maintain a consistent structure --------- Signed-off-by: André Veríssimo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dawid Kałędkowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kartikeya kirar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
Thanks @kartikeyakirar for cleaning up the finish line! Everything is merged and lasts checks are running. |
Unit Test Performance Difference
Additional test case details
Results for commit d7f056d ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Co-authored-by: André Veríssimo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
I went again through the initial bullet point list and it seems fine to merge!
Thanks @averissimo . I also did went again through the list, once you pointed some obvious mistakes! |
Fearless leader, we await the glorious merge 🐴 ⚔️ |
veni, vidi, merge |
Part of #624
Title
is not duplicated in PackageDescription
in DESCRIPTION file (e.g. this happens in teal.slice currently)Title
andDescription
fields of DESCRIPTION file are quoted with'
.Rbuildignore
teal.*
mentions are lower-cased and quoted/main/
in the address but it has/latest/
instead, so we always expose the documentation of the latest release and not what's currently on main branch but not yet released.lintr: indentation_linter = NULL
@noMd
(in favor ofRoxygen: list(markdown = TRUE)
inDESCRIPTION
)