-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
261 multiple improvements to get_code
function and it's documentation
#263
Conversation
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.data # Conflicts: # tests/testthat/test-get_code.R
@linksto
tag combination
@linksto
tag combinationget_code
for function definition and @linksto
tag combination
Wrong link? |
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: 1cb250c Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Test Performance DifferenceAdditional test case details
Results for commit b70a424 ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
…/insightsengineering/teal.data into 261_get_code_fun_definition@main
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 14 suites 1s ⏱️ Results for commit 1cb250c. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
…/insightsengineering/teal.data into 261_get_code_fun_definition@main
…nts (#272) Close #271 --------- Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: André Veríssimo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aleksander Chlebowski <[email protected]>
…de for `get_code` (#268) Close #267 Used @gogonzo solution from this PR to fix this https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.data/pull/262/files#diff-66a61facc4f5ca86215d63af40e2645b364950439051784916316ef78d5073c8R102-R110 --------- Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dawid Kałędkowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dawid Kałędkowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
get_code
for function definition and @linksto
tag combinationget_code
function and it's documentation
@gogonzo As far I am concerned this is ready to merge. Unless you feel the docs require more work, please approve. |
Hey @gogonzo any final words on this one? This PR initially fixed issues catched at #261 but we also were able to do below during this PR
|
Pending unit tests, of course. |
on it |
…call. fix_comments needs to be changed since it assumed first row contains comments that were suprisingly pushed from other call to another one. now fix_comments needs to verify two rows
Should be fixed with 3ef0707 This PR is an aggregator of multiple other PRs. It occurred one indepdent PR provided features that broke features provided independently in another one :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 time to go
Close #216EDIT
Close #261