Check 🛠

avoid pipe and dot; add note blocklist #981

Sign in to view logs

GitHub Actions / Unit Tests Summary failed Nov 30, 2023 in 0s

1 errors, 196 pass in 1m 28s

      1 files     24 suites 1m 28s ⏱️
  197 tests   196 ✔️ 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥
1 498 runs 1 497 ✔️ 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥

Results for commit c2c4faf.

Annotations

Check failure on line 0 in Result_Data_Frames

github-actions / Unit Tests Summary

1 out of 6 runs with error: as_result_df_works_with_visual_output_as_viewer_ (Result_Data_Frames)

rtables.Rcheck/tests/testthat/junit-result.xml [took 0s]

Raw output


            Error in `result_df_fun(tt, ...)`: When expanding colnames structure, we were not able to find the same number of columns as in the result data frame. This is a bug. Please report it. ('test-result_data_frame.R:86:3')
Error in `result_df_fun(tt, ...)`: When expanding colnames structure, we were not able to find the same number of columns as in the result data frame. This is a bug. Please report it.
Backtrace:
     ▆
  1. ├─testthat::expect_silent(...) at test-result_data_frame.R:86:3
  2. │ └─testthat:::quasi_capture(enquo(object), NULL, evaluate_promise)
  3. │   ├─testthat (local) .capture(...)
  4. │   │ ├─withr::with_output_sink(...)
  5. │   │ │ └─base::force(code)
  6. │   │ ├─base::withCallingHandlers(...)
  7. │   │ └─base::withVisible(code)
  8. │   └─rlang::eval_bare(quo_get_expr(.quo), quo_get_env(.quo))
  9. └─rtables::as_result_df(...)
 10.   └─rtables (local) result_df_fun(tt, ...)

View more details on GitHub Actions