-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolving Merge Conflicts for #112 #115
Conversation
**What changes are proposed in this pull request?** Functions are renamed according to new conventions: `ard_<pkgname>_<fnname>()` if a package specific function is used If a `.` appears in a function name it will be replaced with a `_` in the ard_*() function name. closes #106 @ayogasekaram -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [x] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [x] PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: `usethis::pr_merge_main()` - [x] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [x] If a new `ard_*()` function was added, it passes the ARD structural checks from `cards::check_ard_structure()`. - [x] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): `devtools::test_coverage()` - [x] Request a reviewer Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [x] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [x] Run `pkgdown::build_site()`. Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website. - [x] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: `devtools::test_coverage()` When the branch is ready to be merged: - [x] Update `NEWS.md` with the changes from this pull request under the heading "`# cards (development version)`". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see `NEWS.md` for examples). - [ ] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [ ] Approve Pull Request - [ ] Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge". --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Sjoberg <[email protected]>
**What changes are proposed in this pull request?** add `ard_aod_wald_test` function closes #84 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [x] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [x] PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: `usethis::pr_merge_main()` - [x] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [x] If a new `ard_*()` function was added, it passes the ARD structural checks from `cards::check_ard_structure()`. - [x] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): `devtools::test_coverage()` - [x] Request a reviewer Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [x] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [x] Run `pkgdown::build_site()`. Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website. - [x] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: `devtools::test_coverage()` When the branch is ready to be merged: - [x] Update `NEWS.md` with the changes from this pull request under the heading "`# cards (development version)`". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see `NEWS.md` for examples). - [x] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [x] Approve Pull Request - [x] Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge". --------- Signed-off-by: Daniel Sjoberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Abinaya Yogasekaram <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Daniel Sjoberg <[email protected]>
**What changes are proposed in this pull request?** - `ard_stats_anova()` for calculating ANOVA results using `stats::anova()`. (#12) There are two implementations of this function via S3 methods. 1. The first is when a user calculates the `anova()` object and passes it to `ard_stats_anova()`. 2. The second is when a user passes a data frame. We use that data frame and information from the other arguments to construct the models and pass the models to `anova()` **Reference GitHub issue associated with pull request.** _e.g., 'closes #<issue number>'_ closes #12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [ ] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [ ] PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: `usethis::pr_merge_main()` - [ ] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [ ] If a new `ard_*()` function was added, it passes the ARD structural checks from `cards::check_ard_structure()`. - [ ] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): `devtools::test_coverage()` - [ ] Request a reviewer Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete) - [x] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added. - [x] Run `pkgdown::build_site()`. Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website. - [x] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: `devtools::test_coverage()` When the branch is ready to be merged: - [ ] Update `NEWS.md` with the changes from this pull request under the heading "`# cards (development version)`". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see `NEWS.md` for examples). - [ ] **All** GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅ - [ ] Approve Pull Request - [ ] Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge". --------- Signed-off-by: Daniel Sjoberg <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Emily de la Rua <[email protected]>
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: e04c13a Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that covers everything on my end! Thanks Daniel!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good on my end as well @ddsjoberg! Thank you :)
Thank you @edelarua @ayogasekaram for the review!! |
Hi @edelarua and @ayogasekaram ,
@ayogasekaram recently updated function names to follow our convention
ard_<pkg>_<fn>()
, and @edelarua added cli environment handling. Both updates resulted in a large number of changes to files and file names.This PR is going into @edelarua 's PR for adding the cli env handling (#112), and is meant to resolve all the conflicts. Can you both please review and approve this PR? Please check that I haven't undone any of your important changes from either initiative? Apologies for the incredibly poor planning on my part. 😬