-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make docker build again. package updates. eslint fix ran #18
make docker build again. package updates. eslint fix ran #18
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files, primarily focusing on Docker configuration and dependency updates. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Docker
participant App
participant PackageManager
User->>Docker: Build Image
Docker->>Docker: Read .dockerignore
Docker->>Docker: Exclude /node_modules
Docker->>App: Execute Dockerfile
App->>App: Set MNEMONIC
App->>App: Expose Ports 7010, 7011
App->>PackageManager: Install Dependencies
PackageManager->>PackageManager: Update Dependencies
PackageManager-->>App: Dependencies Updated
App-->>Docker: Image Built
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint
4-8
: Remove unnecessary TypeScript global installationSince TypeScript compilation (
tsc
) is no longer used in the build process, the global TypeScript installation is unnecessary.RUN npm install\ - && npm install typescript -g COPY . . -#RUN tsc
15-16
: Document port changes in commentsThe exposed ports have changed from 3000 to 7010 and 7011. Please add comments explaining the purpose of each port for better maintainability.
-EXPOSE 7010 -EXPOSE 7011 +# Port 7010: <add purpose here> +EXPOSE 7010 +# Port 7011: <add purpose here> +EXPOSE 7011
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.dockerignore
(1 hunks)Dockerfile
(1 hunks)package.json
(2 hunks)src/msgs/recvPacket.ts
(1 hunks)src/workers/index.ts
(1 hunks)src/workers/wallet.ts
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/msgs/recvPacket.ts
- src/workers/wallet.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (3)
17-21
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure version consistency across @cosmjs packages
While most @cosmjs packages are updated to ^0.32.4, @cosmjs/encoding is still on ^0.32.3. This could lead to compatibility issues.
- "@cosmjs/encoding": "^0.32.3",
+ "@cosmjs/encoding": "^0.32.4",
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
26-26
: Verify compatibility with new cosmjs-types dependency
Please ensure that the newly added cosmjs-types@^0.9.0 is compatible with your @cosmjs dependencies (which are on 0.32.x).
✅ Verification successful
[email protected] is compatible with @[email protected] dependencies
The combination is safe to use. The [email protected] package is specifically designed to work with @cosmjs packages in the 0.32.x range. This is a common and well-tested combination in the Cosmos ecosystem, where [email protected] provides the necessary protobuf types for @cosmjs/stargate and related packages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential version conflicts
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
npm info @cosmjs/[email protected] peerDependencies
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual dependencies in package.json
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies'
# Also check if there are any @cosmjs dependencies
rg "@cosmjs" -A 1 -B 1 package.json
Length of output: 852
42-42
: Verify ESLint major version upgrade
The upgrade from ESLint 8.x to 9.x is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. Please verify:
- Compatibility with your current ESLint configuration
- Any required migration steps
- Impact on existing lint rules
src/workers/index.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-1
: Verify IBC package compatibility and key management security.
Given this file's critical role in IBC operations and the PR's package updates:
-
Please verify that the updated
@initia/initia.js
package (mentioned in PR description) maintains compatibility with the IBC message generation and processing logic in this file. -
Consider enhancing key management security:
- Add input validation for environment variables in
createKey
- Consider using a secure key management service instead of environment variables
- Add logging for key operations (without exposing sensitive data)
- Add input validation for environment variables in
Let's check the package compatibility:
86-86
: LGTM! Improved type inference by removing redundant type assertion.
The removal of as number[]
is a good change as TypeScript can correctly infer that filtering undefined
from an array of number | undefined
results in number[]
. This aligns with the PR's objective of fixing TypeScript-related issues.
Let's verify the type inference works correctly:
✅ Verification successful
Type assertion removal is consistent with codebase patterns
The verification shows that similar filter patterns in the codebase (src/workers/wallet.ts
) also don't use type assertions, confirming this change aligns with the existing codebase style. The pattern is used consistently without type assertions across different files, indicating TypeScript's type inference is sufficient in these cases.
- Similar pattern found in
src/workers/wallet.ts
without type assertion:return res.filter((v) => v !== undefined)
- No other instances of
as number[]
assertions found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript can infer the correct type without the assertion
# Check if there are any type errors in the file
npx tsc --noEmit src/workers/index.ts
# Look for similar patterns that might need the same fix
ast-grep --pattern 'filter((v) => v !== undefined) as number[]'
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the type inference:
# 1. Check if there are any other similar type assertions in the codebase
rg "as number\[\]" -A 2 -B 2
# 2. Look for other filter undefined patterns to compare
rg "filter.*undefined" -A 2 -B 2
# 3. Check the context of this specific change
rg "wallets.*startHeight" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 911
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you for commits
TSC is complaining in docker build.
so just removed it.
updated docker container for new port usage (7010/7011)
updated package versions (eslint was deprecated)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
MNEMONIC
for seed phrase storage.7010
and7011
in the Docker configuration.Bug Fixes
Chores
/node_modules
to.dockerignore
to reduce Docker image size.