Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make docker build again. package updates. eslint fix ran #18

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

PFC-developer
Copy link
Contributor

@PFC-developer PFC-developer commented Dec 7, 2024

TSC is complaining in docker build.
so just removed it.
updated docker container for new port usage (7010/7011)
updated package versions (eslint was deprecated)

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Updated Docker configuration to improve build efficiency and metadata.
    • Introduced a new environment variable MNEMONIC for seed phrase storage.
    • Added new exposed ports 7010 and 7011 in the Docker configuration.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary type assertions in wallet filtering methods, enhancing code clarity.
  • Chores

    • Updated various dependencies to their latest versions for improved functionality and security.
    • Added /node_modules to .dockerignore to reduce Docker image size.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files, primarily focusing on Docker configuration and dependency updates. The .dockerignore file now excludes the node_modules directory, while the Dockerfile has new metadata labels, updated exposed ports, and an added environment variable. The package.json reflects multiple dependency version updates and the addition of a new dependency. Minor formatting changes were made in the TypeScript files, but the overall functionality remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.dockerignore Modified entry for node_modules to ignore it differently and added /node_modules to be ignored.
Dockerfile Commented out TypeScript compilation, added labels for metadata, updated exposed ports, added MNEMONIC env variable.
package.json Updated versions for multiple dependencies and added new dependency cosmjs-types.
src/msgs/recvPacket.ts Minor formatting change in import statement (removed extra space).
src/workers/index.ts Modified filtering in init method to remove type assertion on filtered array.
src/workers/wallet.ts Removed explicit return type cast in filterChannelOpenCloseEvents method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Docker
    participant App
    participant PackageManager

    User->>Docker: Build Image
    Docker->>Docker: Read .dockerignore
    Docker->>Docker: Exclude /node_modules
    Docker->>App: Execute Dockerfile
    App->>App: Set MNEMONIC
    App->>App: Expose Ports 7010, 7011
    App->>PackageManager: Install Dependencies
    PackageManager->>PackageManager: Update Dependencies
    PackageManager-->>App: Dependencies Updated
    App-->>Docker: Image Built
Loading

🐰 In the code, I hop and play,
🐇 Ignoring node_modules today!
🌱 With ports anew, the seeds we sow,
🚀 Our app's ready, watch it go!
🎉 Dependencies fresh, all updated right,
🌟 Let's celebrate this coding delight!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f221e21 and 2db7ce3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .dockerignore
  • Dockerfile

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)

Line range hint 4-8: Remove unnecessary TypeScript global installation

Since TypeScript compilation (tsc) is no longer used in the build process, the global TypeScript installation is unnecessary.

RUN npm install\
-    && npm install typescript -g
COPY . .
-#RUN tsc

15-16: Document port changes in comments

The exposed ports have changed from 3000 to 7010 and 7011. Please add comments explaining the purpose of each port for better maintainability.

-EXPOSE 7010
-EXPOSE 7011
+# Port 7010: <add purpose here>
+EXPOSE 7010
+# Port 7011: <add purpose here>
+EXPOSE 7011
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d9143c and f221e21.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/msgs/recvPacket.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/workers/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/workers/wallet.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/msgs/recvPacket.ts
  • src/workers/wallet.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (3)

17-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure version consistency across @cosmjs packages

While most @cosmjs packages are updated to ^0.32.4, @cosmjs/encoding is still on ^0.32.3. This could lead to compatibility issues.

-    "@cosmjs/encoding": "^0.32.3",
+    "@cosmjs/encoding": "^0.32.4",

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


26-26: Verify compatibility with new cosmjs-types dependency

Please ensure that the newly added cosmjs-types@^0.9.0 is compatible with your @cosmjs dependencies (which are on 0.32.x).

✅ Verification successful

[email protected] is compatible with @[email protected] dependencies

The combination is safe to use. The [email protected] package is specifically designed to work with @cosmjs packages in the 0.32.x range. This is a common and well-tested combination in the Cosmos ecosystem, where [email protected] provides the necessary protobuf types for @cosmjs/stargate and related packages.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential version conflicts
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
npm info @cosmjs/[email protected] peerDependencies

Length of output: 98


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual dependencies in package.json
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies'

# Also check if there are any @cosmjs dependencies
rg "@cosmjs" -A 1 -B 1 package.json

Length of output: 852


42-42: Verify ESLint major version upgrade

The upgrade from ESLint 8.x to 9.x is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. Please verify:

  1. Compatibility with your current ESLint configuration
  2. Any required migration steps
  3. Impact on existing lint rules
src/workers/index.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-1: Verify IBC package compatibility and key management security.

Given this file's critical role in IBC operations and the PR's package updates:

  1. Please verify that the updated @initia/initia.js package (mentioned in PR description) maintains compatibility with the IBC message generation and processing logic in this file.

  2. Consider enhancing key management security:

    • Add input validation for environment variables in createKey
    • Consider using a secure key management service instead of environment variables
    • Add logging for key operations (without exposing sensitive data)

Let's check the package compatibility:


86-86: LGTM! Improved type inference by removing redundant type assertion.

The removal of as number[] is a good change as TypeScript can correctly infer that filtering undefined from an array of number | undefined results in number[]. This aligns with the PR's objective of fixing TypeScript-related issues.

Let's verify the type inference works correctly:

✅ Verification successful

Type assertion removal is consistent with codebase patterns

The verification shows that similar filter patterns in the codebase (src/workers/wallet.ts) also don't use type assertions, confirming this change aligns with the existing codebase style. The pattern is used consistently without type assertions across different files, indicating TypeScript's type inference is sufficient in these cases.

  • Similar pattern found in src/workers/wallet.ts without type assertion: return res.filter((v) => v !== undefined)
  • No other instances of as number[] assertions found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript can infer the correct type without the assertion

# Check if there are any type errors in the file
npx tsc --noEmit src/workers/index.ts

# Look for similar patterns that might need the same fix
ast-grep --pattern 'filter((v) => v !== undefined) as number[]'

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the type inference:

# 1. Check if there are any other similar type assertions in the codebase
rg "as number\[\]" -A 2 -B 2

# 2. Look for other filter undefined patterns to compare
rg "filter.*undefined" -A 2 -B 2

# 3. Check the context of this specific change
rg "wallets.*startHeight" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 911

.dockerignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you for commits

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 merged commit 294bff3 into initia-labs:main Dec 17, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants