Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: challenger as channel admin #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

feat: challenger as channel admin #68

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Contributor

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Sep 25, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the bridge_config structure to improve clarity by changing challengers to a single challenger property.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved inconsistencies in the Swagger documentation related to the bridge_config object.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependency versions for improved performance and security.

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Sep 25, 2024
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2024 13:32
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the bridge_config object in the Swagger YAML file, where the challengers property has been changed from an array of strings to a single string property named challenger. Additionally, the go.mod file has been updated to reflect new versions for several dependencies, including github.com/initia-labs/OPinit and github.com/initia-labs/initia, which have been incremented from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1. A replacement directive for github.com/cometbft/cometbft has also been updated to a new commit hash.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml Modified bridge_config: changed challengers (array of strings) to challenger (string).
go.mod Updated versions for dependencies: github.com/initia-labs/OPinit, github.com/initia-labs/initia from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1; updated replacement for github.com/cometbft/cometbft to a new commit hash.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant API
    participant Swagger

    User->>API: Request bridge configuration
    API->>Swagger: Retrieve bridge_config
    Swagger-->>API: Return bridge_config with challenger
    API-->>User: Send bridge configuration with challenger
Loading

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A challenger now takes the room.
Dependencies updated with care,
New versions dance in the air!
Hops of joy, we celebrate,
In code we trust, it’s never too late! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.73%. Comparing base (a0c1dbd) to head (b32e278).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.73%   64.73%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        3207     3207           
=======================================
  Hits         2076     2076           
  Misses        956      956           
  Partials      175      175           

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (1)

71626-71627: LGTM! Consider system-wide impact.

The change to challenger is consistently applied in the definitions section, ensuring a complete and coherent update to the API specification.

Given that this change modifies a core concept in the API (from multiple challengers to a single challenger), consider the following:

  1. Ensure that all client-side code interacting with this API is updated to handle a single challenger instead of an array.
  2. Update any documentation or guides that reference the challenger concept.
  3. Consider adding a migration plan or deprecation notice if this change might break existing integrations.
  4. Review and update any relevant test cases to reflect this architectural change.
go.mod (1)

284-284: LGTM. Consider documenting the reason for this specific commit.

The update to the replacement directive for github.com/cometbft/cometbft points to a more recent commit in the custom fork. This change provides precise version control, which is good for reproducibility.

Consider adding a comment explaining why this specific commit is being used and what changes it introduces. This will help with future maintenance and upgrades.

Example:

-	github.com/cometbft/cometbft => github.com/initia-labs/cometbft v0.0.0-20240925132752-ff8ff0126261
+	// TODO: Document the reason for using this specific commit
+	// e.g., "This commit includes critical bug fixes for X and Y"
+	github.com/cometbft/cometbft => github.com/initia-labs/cometbft v0.0.0-20240925132752-ff8ff0126261
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0c1dbd and b32e278.

🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (4 hunks)
  • go.mod (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (6)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (3)

70723-70724: Consistent change applied.

The modification to challenger is consistently applied in this section of the Swagger file, maintaining a coherent API definition.


70852-70853: Consistent change applied. Verify completeness.

The modification to challenger is consistently applied throughout the Swagger file, ensuring a uniform API definition.

To ensure all instances have been updated, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all instances of 'challenger' in the Swagger file
# have been updated from array to string type.

# Test: Search for any remaining instances of 'challengers' (plural) in the Swagger file
rg --type yaml 'challengers:' client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml

# Test: Confirm all instances of 'challenger' (singular) are of type string
rg --type yaml -A 1 'challenger:' client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml | rg 'type: string'

37128-37129: LGTM! Verify impact on related code.

The change from challengers (array) to challenger (string) aligns with the PR objective of introducing a single challenger as a channel administrator. This modification is consistent across the Swagger file.

Please run the following script to check for any code that might be affected by this change:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: The change from challengers to challenger is confined to client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml and does not affect other parts of the codebase.

No additional updates are necessary as there are no references to challengers outside the Swagger YAML file.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of 'challengers' in the codebase
# to ensure all related code is updated accordingly.

# Test: Search for 'challengers' in Go files
rg --type go 'challengers'

# Test: Search for 'challengers' in JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg --type js --type ts 'challengers'

Length of output: 267

go.mod (3)

174-174: LGTM. Indirect dependency update is consistent.

The update of the indirect dependency github.com/initia-labs/OPinit/api to v0.5.1 is consistent with the main OPinit dependency update. This alignment helps maintain compatibility and reduces potential conflicts.


Line range hint 36-284: Overall, the changes look good. Please address the following points:

  1. Verify that the updates to github.com/initia-labs/OPinit and github.com/initia-labs/initia (v0.5.0 to v0.5.1) don't introduce any breaking changes.
  2. Consider adding a comment to explain the reason for using the specific commit v0.0.0-20240925132752-ff8ff0126261 in the replacement directive for github.com/cometbft/cometbft.

These changes keep the project up-to-date with the latest minor versions of dependencies and provide precise version control for the custom cometbft fork. Ensuring compatibility and documenting decisions will help with future maintenance and upgrades.


36-37: LGTM. Verify compatibility with updated dependencies.

The version updates for github.com/initia-labs/OPinit and github.com/initia-labs/initia from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1 are minor and likely include bug fixes or small improvements. However, it's important to ensure these updates don't introduce any breaking changes.

To verify the impact of these changes, run the following script:

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 1be7370 into main Sep 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the feat/ibcperm-admin branch September 25, 2024 14:10
hallazzang added a commit to milkyway-labs/milkyway that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant