Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Noble USDC #236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024
Merged

Add Noble USDC #236

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

alecande11
Copy link
Contributor

@alecande11 alecande11 commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced "Noble USDC" asset to the Initia testnet, including display name, symbol, and image URIs.
    • Expanded asset list with new denomination units and base denomination for better usability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a new asset entry for Noble USDC to the Initia testnet's asset list. This addition includes comprehensive details about the asset such as denomination units, base denomination, display name, symbol, and image references for both PNG and SVG formats. The new entry expands the asset registry with specific metadata for Noble USDC.

Changes

File Change Summary
testnets/initia/assetlist.json Added new Noble USDC asset entry with full metadata, including denom units, base/display names, symbol, and image URIs

Poem

🐰 A noble coin joins the testnet's dance,
With denom units in a digital trance,
nUSDC sparkles, images bright,
A rabbit's cheer for this blockchain delight! 🚀
Welcome, new asset, to Initia's stage! 🌟


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
testnets/initia/assetlist.json (1)

322-331: Consider using distinct images for Noble USDC

The current configuration uses the same image paths as the existing USDC token. To avoid user confusion, consider creating and using unique images that clearly identify this as Noble USDC.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a3bb23 and d0de61f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • testnets/initia/assetlist.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
testnets/initia/assetlist.json (3)

306-321: LGTM! Asset configuration follows the standard structure

The Noble USDC asset entry is well-structured with appropriate differentiation from the existing USDC token:

  • Uses 'nUSDC' prefix in symbol and display name
  • Maintains consistent exponent values (0 for base, 6 for display)
  • Correctly formatted IBC denom

304-331: Verify schema compliance

Please ensure the new asset entry complies with the schema defined in "assetlist.schema.json".

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the schema and the JSON structure.


Based on the schema definition and the Noble USDC asset entry, I can now verify the compliance. Let me check the complete asset entry structure one more time.


Asset entry complies with schema requirements

The Noble USDC asset entry follows the schema requirements:

  • Contains all required fields: denom_units, base, display, name, and symbol
  • Denom units are properly structured with denom and exponent
  • Image URLs follow the required format with https and correct file extensions
  • Optional fields (description, coingecko_id, images) are properly formatted
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if schema file exists and validate JSON
if [ -f "assetlist.schema.json" ]; then
    # Note: Actual validation would require a JSON schema validator
    echo "Schema file exists. Please validate against schema."
fi

Length of output: 147


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's look at the schema definition
cat assetlist.schema.json

# Then, let's check if there are any other similar asset entries in the file
rg -A 5 '"description": ".*USDC"' testnets/initia/assetlist.json

Length of output: 14121


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete Noble USDC asset entry with context
rg -A 20 '"description": "Noble USDC"' testnets/initia/assetlist.json

Length of output: 812


309-310: Verify handling of multiple USDC tokens

Please ensure that the system can properly handle and distinguish between:

  1. The existing USDC token (base: "uusdc")
  2. This new Noble USDC token (base: IBC denom)

This is particularly important for:

  • Token selection in UI
  • Transaction processing
  • Balance displays

Also applies to: 313-314

✅ Verification successful

Let's examine the token handling implementation in these files to verify how multiple USDC tokens are handled.


Multiple USDC tokens are properly distinguished by their base denoms

Based on the registry files analysis, the system properly handles multiple USDC tokens by using distinct base denoms:

  • The existing USDC uses base denom "uusdc"
  • The IBC USDC tokens in other networks use their respective IBC denoms (e.g., "ibc/8E27BA2D5493AF5636760E354E46004562C46AB7EC0CC4C1CA14E9E20E2545B5")

Each token is clearly defined with:

  • Unique base denom as primary identifier
  • Proper denom units configuration
  • Network-specific image assets
  • Additional metadata like type_asset for EVM tokens
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for USDC token handling in the codebase
rg -l "USDC" | grep -v "assetlist.json"

Length of output: 272


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check USDC handling in the registry files
for file in $(fd assets.ts); do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  rg -A 5 -B 5 "USDC" "$file"
done

Length of output: 8844


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for token handling patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = {
  $$$
  symbol: "USDC",
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 74


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README for any token handling documentation
cat README.md | rg -A 5 -B 5 "USDC"

Length of output: 2669

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 merged commit 57714e5 into initia-labs:main Dec 23, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants