-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Noble USDC #236
Add Noble USDC #236
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request adds a new asset entry for Noble USDC to the Initia testnet's asset list. This addition includes comprehensive details about the asset such as denomination units, base denomination, display name, symbol, and image references for both PNG and SVG formats. The new entry expands the asset registry with specific metadata for Noble USDC. Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
testnets/initia/assetlist.json (1)
322-331
: Consider using distinct images for Noble USDCThe current configuration uses the same image paths as the existing USDC token. To avoid user confusion, consider creating and using unique images that clearly identify this as Noble USDC.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
testnets/initia/assetlist.json
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
testnets/initia/assetlist.json (3)
306-321
: LGTM! Asset configuration follows the standard structure
The Noble USDC asset entry is well-structured with appropriate differentiation from the existing USDC token:
- Uses 'nUSDC' prefix in symbol and display name
- Maintains consistent exponent values (0 for base, 6 for display)
- Correctly formatted IBC denom
304-331
: Verify schema compliance
Please ensure the new asset entry complies with the schema defined in "assetlist.schema.json".
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the schema and the JSON structure.
Based on the schema definition and the Noble USDC asset entry, I can now verify the compliance. Let me check the complete asset entry structure one more time.
Asset entry complies with schema requirements
The Noble USDC asset entry follows the schema requirements:
- Contains all required fields: denom_units, base, display, name, and symbol
- Denom units are properly structured with denom and exponent
- Image URLs follow the required format with https and correct file extensions
- Optional fields (description, coingecko_id, images) are properly formatted
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if schema file exists and validate JSON
if [ -f "assetlist.schema.json" ]; then
# Note: Actual validation would require a JSON schema validator
echo "Schema file exists. Please validate against schema."
fi
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's look at the schema definition
cat assetlist.schema.json
# Then, let's check if there are any other similar asset entries in the file
rg -A 5 '"description": ".*USDC"' testnets/initia/assetlist.json
Length of output: 14121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete Noble USDC asset entry with context
rg -A 20 '"description": "Noble USDC"' testnets/initia/assetlist.json
Length of output: 812
309-310
: Verify handling of multiple USDC tokens
Please ensure that the system can properly handle and distinguish between:
- The existing USDC token (base: "uusdc")
- This new Noble USDC token (base: IBC denom)
This is particularly important for:
- Token selection in UI
- Transaction processing
- Balance displays
Also applies to: 313-314
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the token handling implementation in these files to verify how multiple USDC tokens are handled.
Multiple USDC tokens are properly distinguished by their base denoms
Based on the registry files analysis, the system properly handles multiple USDC tokens by using distinct base denoms:
- The existing USDC uses base denom "uusdc"
- The IBC USDC tokens in other networks use their respective IBC denoms (e.g., "ibc/8E27BA2D5493AF5636760E354E46004562C46AB7EC0CC4C1CA14E9E20E2545B5")
Each token is clearly defined with:
- Unique base denom as primary identifier
- Proper denom units configuration
- Network-specific image assets
- Additional metadata like type_asset for EVM tokens
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for USDC token handling in the codebase
rg -l "USDC" | grep -v "assetlist.json"
Length of output: 272
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check USDC handling in the registry files
for file in $(fd assets.ts); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "USDC" "$file"
done
Length of output: 8844
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for token handling patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = {
$$$
symbol: "USDC",
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check README for any token handling documentation
cat README.md | rg -A 5 -B 5 "USDC"
Length of output: 2669
Summary by CodeRabbit