-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
4 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
# | ||
# built using mmark 2. | ||
|
||
VERSION = 36 | ||
VERSION = 37 | ||
DOCNAME = draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis | ||
#XMLFLAGS=-v | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2813,7 +2813,9 @@ in detail in this document. | |
The DNS Tree Walk also incorporates PSD policy discovery, which was introduced in | ||
[@RFC9091]. That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the results of that experiment were | ||
that the RFC was not implemented as written. Instead, this document redefines the | ||
algorithm for PSD policy discovery, and thus obsoletes [@RFC9091]. | ||
algorithm for PSD policy discovery, and thus obsoletes [@RFC9091]. Specifically, the | ||
DNS Tree Walk defined in this document obviates the need for a PSD DMARC registry, | ||
and that PSD DMARC regisry is what made RFC 9091 and Experimental RFC. | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
toddherr
via email
Author
Contributor
|
||
|
||
These algorithm changes introduce the possibility of interoperability issues where a | ||
Domain Owner expects a DMARC Policy or an Organizational Domain to be identified by | ||
|
There's a typo here ("regisry").