Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GammaGammaSolutionFinder input collection parameters to match … #143

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ggrenier
Copy link
Contributor

@ggrenier ggrenier commented May 7, 2024

…Marlin Processor Code

BEGINRELEASENOTES
The GammaGammaSolutionFinder Marlin Processor code has been updated years ago to change the way inpute collection names are provided, see https://github.com/iLCSoft/MarlinReco/blob/master/Analysis/GammaGammaSolutionFinder/src/GammaGammaSolutionFinder.cc

ENDRELEASENOTES

@tmadlener
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. This looks straight forward. I will add some CI for this and future PRs and then merge afterwards, unless you want to add more changes to this.

@tmadlener
Copy link
Contributor

Apologies this took longer than anticipated, but there is CI now. Can you rebase on top of the latest master branch (or merge that into this one?). I have added some CI in #145 which should also confirm that this works as expected.

<parameter name="InputParticleCollectionName1" value="GammaGammaCandidatePi0s" />
<parameter name="InputParticleCollectionName2" value="GammaGammaCandidateEtas" />
<parameter name="InputParticleCollectionName3" value="GammaGammaCandidateEtaPrimes" />
<parameter name="gammagammaCandidateCollections" >
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is gammagammaCandidateCollections the correct capitalization or the one from the Gaudi configuration with GammaGammaCandidateCollections?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants