Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TVS Diode SMAJ16CA #131

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

TVS Diode SMAJ16CA #131

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

postrowski3
Copy link
Contributor

Used existing Zener Diode symbol and 1206-diode footprint to make the new device.

Pull Request (PR) into Circuits-Support-2024

Delete the below block when actually making your PR!

Part Description

I used the existing Zener Diode symbol and 1206-Diode footprint to make the SMAJ16CA device.

Additional Information

Data Sheet: https://www.littelfuse.com/~/media/electronics/datasheets/tvs_diodes/littelfuse_tvs_diode_smaj_datasheet.pdf.pdf

Checklist

  • Did you create any new schematics or boards?
    • Did you make a PR for them in circuits-2024? If so, please pause until you get this PR merged.
  • x Did you pull main into your branch?
    • x Did you check for merge conflicts?
    • Did you resolve any that occurred? If you are having trouble or are confused, contact a lead!
  • x Did you fill out the above template?
  • x Did you assign the right people for review (on the right)?
  • x Did you comply with the library style guidelines?

Used existing Zener Diode symbol and 1206-diode footprint to make the new device.
Copy link
Contributor

@shaynoorani shaynoorani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is almost correct, however this Diode is a bidirectional TVS diode so the symbol would be slightly different.

@shaynoorani shaynoorani self-requested a review January 11, 2024 17:14
shaynoorani
shaynoorani previously approved these changes Jan 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@shaynoorani shaynoorani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@shaynoorani shaynoorani dismissed their stale review January 26, 2024 02:43

The merge-base changed after approval.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants