-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow frontier simulation when Base Fee is present #7965
Merged
Gabriel-Trintinalia
merged 10 commits into
hyperledger:main
from
Gabriel-Trintinalia:allow-frontier-simulation
Dec 6, 2024
Merged
Allow frontier simulation when Base Fee is present #7965
Gabriel-Trintinalia
merged 10 commits into
hyperledger:main
from
Gabriel-Trintinalia:allow-frontier-simulation
Dec 6, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
fab-10
reviewed
Dec 2, 2024
ethereum/core/src/main/java/org/hyperledger/besu/ethereum/transaction/TransactionSimulator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ethereum/core/src/main/java/org/hyperledger/besu/ethereum/transaction/TransactionSimulator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
macfarla
reviewed
Dec 3, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changelog?
fab-10
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2024
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]>
daniellehrner
pushed a commit
to daniellehrner/besu
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-Trintinalia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lehrner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description
This PR resolves an issue where simulating a legacy transaction in a post-frontier fork environment was impossible. The current logic defaults to using
maxFeePerGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
, which incorrectly identifies the transaction type as EIP-1559.Changes in
TransactionSimulator
:buildTransaction
method to conditionally setmaxFeePerGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
only if they are provided. This ensures proper handling of both legacy transactions and EIP-1559 transactions.Changes in Test Cases:
shouldSimulateLegacyTransactionWhenBaseFeeNotZero
, to confirm that the transaction simulator correctly processes legacy transactions when the base fee is not zero.