-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: enable correct_pagination_assets_after_creating_new_one test #5192
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lohachov Mykhailo <[email protected]>
// FIXME transaction is rejected for more than a certain number of instructions | ||
const N_ASSETS: usize = 12; | ||
const N_ASSETS: usize = 9; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this test has failed for some other reason than the FIXME
item. I see the same result by iterating over submit_blocking
and there are no transaction rejections due to too many instructions in submit_all_blocking
. In my local 10 and 11 are the threshold of whether it passes or not
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the default fetch size, 10? this might be related to result batching
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test fails due to the lexicographical sorting of strings ("1" -> "10" -> "11", not "1" -> "2" -> "3").
All of the sorting tests have this limit of 10 because they will also fail if the number is increased.
This test should verify that adding an asset in the middle should not break the ordering, which was not checked in the previous version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the issue would be that metadata leaf values are implicitly transmuted from numbers to strings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since the metadata value is a json string. I'm not sure if we have a functionality to specify a mapping/key function for sorting. Isn't the purpose of having json string to generalize metadata and defer custom processing to the user?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since PartialOrd
and Ord
cannot be naturally derived from serde_json::Value
, we could:
- totally discard the concept of sorting metadata value
- originally define order between
Value
variants
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since PartialOrd and Ord cannot be naturally derived from serde_json::Value, we could:
good point. My previous comment should be disregarded. Now I think this is the way to go:
totally discard the concept of sorting metadata value
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we go this way, the problem then is currently we are sorting query results only by metadata
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is where it all started. But since then we moved to untyped metadata value. Maybe it would be good to provide a sorting function? The comparison function will get untyped metadata, parse it and then compare the objects
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, there seems to be a trade-off between keeping metadata values untyped and serving query sorting on the peer side
Resolves #4795
Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.md
.