Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add general example of split/subset on the main "Data Files Configuration" page #1538

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

lhoestq
Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq commented Dec 19, 2024

This way users get an idea of what it means in practice without having to click on the documentation on automatic split detection or on the documentation on manual configuration of splits and subsets

I also moved the Tip on setting a default configuration in its right paragraph

@lhoestq lhoestq requested a review from Vaibhavs10 December 19, 2024 15:19
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

Copy link
Member

@julien-c julien-c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice

Copy link
Member

@Vaibhavs10 Vaibhavs10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@lhoestq lhoestq merged commit 1070319 into main Dec 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@lhoestq lhoestq deleted the add-general-example-of-split-subset branch December 19, 2024 15:43
pcuenca added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
Spotted while reading #1538
@pcuenca pcuenca mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
lhoestq pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
Spotted while reading #1538
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants