Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-32875 Ensure rowservice can process fields stored as blobs #19254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

ghalliday
Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday commented Oct 31, 2024

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@ghalliday ghalliday requested a review from jakesmith October 31, 2024 11:54
Copy link

Jira Issue: https://hpccsystems.atlassian.net//browse/HPCC-32875

Jirabot Action Result:
Assigning user: [email protected]
Workflow Transition To: Merge Pending
Updated PR

@AttilaVamos
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps it is not relatd, but unittests crashed on this change:

Testing two processes with a port collision on an instance...Test Complete.
/home/runner/work/_temp/2f68e2d3-8d1f-443d-942a-5bbba156eb39.sh: line 3:  4969 Segmentation fault      sudo /opt/HPCCSystems/bin/unittests

and the core trace shows:

Core was generated by `/opt/HPCCSystems/bin/unittests -e IKeyManagerTest'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00007f0b688135fe in RtlRecord::RtlRecord(RtlFieldInfo const* const*, bool) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libeclrtl.so

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f0b610e8300 (LWP 39553)):
#0  0x00007f0b688135fe in RtlRecord::RtlRecord(RtlFieldInfo const* const*, bool) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libeclrtl.so
#1  0x00007f0b68813e00 in COutputMetaData::queryRecordAccessor(bool) const () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libeclrtl.so
#2  0x00007f0b68db52e9 in ?? () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libjhtree.so
#3  0x00007f0b68dc27f9 in IKeyManagerTest::testKeys() () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libjhtree.so
#4  0x00007f0b6b9c6fa2 in CppUnit::TestCaseMethodFunctor::operator()() const () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#5  0x00007f0b6b9bcf0e in CppUnit::DefaultProtector::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#6  0x00007f0b6b9c4110 in CppUnit::ProtectorChain::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#7  0x00007f0b6b9ce794 in CppUnit::TestResult::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::Test*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#8  0x00007f0b6b9c6c59 in CppUnit::TestCase::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#9  0x00007f0b6b9c7233 in CppUnit::TestComposite::doRunChildTests(CppUnit::TestResult*) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#10 0x00007f0b6b9c72b7 in CppUnit::TestComposite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#11 0x00007f0b6b9ce6f2 in CppUnit::TestResult::runTest(CppUnit::Test*) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#12 0x00007f0b6b9d0f9d in CppUnit::TestRunner::run(CppUnit::TestResult&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#13 0x00007f0b6b9d2ff2 in CppUnit::TextTestRunner::run(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, bool, bool) () from /opt/HPCCSystems/lib/libcppunit-1.15.so.1
#14 0x000000000044c0e3 in ?? ()
#15 0x00007f0b630ccd85 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#16 0x000000000044e8be in ?? ()

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member Author

It almost certainly is related. I will debug.

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed a bug in the unittest, and improved the error checking.

Copy link
Member

@jakesmith jakesmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghalliday - looks sensible, 1 question.

@@ -2278,6 +2278,7 @@ class CRemoteIndexReadActivity : public CRemoteIndexBaseActivity

Owned<const IDynamicTransform> translator;
unsigned __int64 chooseN = 0;
bool cleanupBlobs = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it necessary to check in dtor in case of exception? or will they be cleared up as the index is released anyway?

Copy link
Member

@jakesmith jakesmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghalliday - looks good.

@ghalliday ghalliday merged commit 719b98e into hpcc-systems:candidate-9.6.x Oct 31, 2024
21 checks passed
Copy link

Jirabot Action Result:
Added fix version: 9.6.62
Added fix version: 9.8.36
Workflow Transition: 'Resolve issue'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants