Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HPCC-29657 Produce aggregate stats (e.g. spill, cost) whilst a job is running #17786
HPCC-29657 Produce aggregate stats (e.g. spill, cost) whilst a job is running #17786
Changes from 1 commit
48fb0d6
9db0c5f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is confusing. It is adding a "Root" scope with an id of wfid underneath a scope of workflow/graph/subgraph. So effectively in the collection it is global->wfid->graph->subgraph->wfid->.
It make me more convinced it is a mistake to try and merge these two concepts.
It also means roxie works rather differently from eclagent/thor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be simpler to use a std::function, e.g.:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why this is here. I assume it is setting the total file access cost from all the activities. My suspicion is this code isn't quite in the right place. Something like
statscollection->aggregateChildren(StCostFileAccess);
instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is existing relocated from EclSubGraph::updateProgress() line 900. I hadn't considered changing how it was working.
I'll modify to add a member function to IStatisticCollection and use that.