Am for v2.2 #664
Am for v2.2 #664
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/sdk/src/node-api.ts (1)
91-91: Update documentation and dependent code.Ensure that all documentation referring to the
sendMessagefunction is updated to reflect the change frompeerIdtodestination. Also, verify that any dependent code in other packages or projects is updated accordingly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/availability-monitor/package.json (2 hunks)
- apps/discovery-platform/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/rpc-server/package.json (1 hunks)
- examples/ethers/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/sdk/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/node-api.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/sdk/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/rpc-server/package.json (1)
17-17: Verify compatibility with the updated @rpch/sdk versionThe update of
@rpch/sdkfrom4.0.0to4.1.0looks good and aligns with the changes across other projects. However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes that could affect the
@rpch/rpc-serverfunctionality.- Check if any code changes are required in the project to accommodate this update.
- Consider updating the project's own version number if this dependency update introduces significant changes.
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script:
examples/ethers/package.json (1)
16-16: LGTM! Dependency update looks good.The update of
@rpch/sdkto version4.1.0is consistent with the changes mentioned in the PR summary.To ensure compatibility, please verify that:
- The project builds successfully with the new SDK version.
- All functionality dependent on the SDK works as expected.
You can use the following commands to verify:
Also, consider whether the
@rpch-examples/ethersproject version (currently0.1.8) needs to be updated to reflect this change in dependencies.apps/availability-monitor/package.json (2)
3-3: Verify the intentionality of the version bump.The package version has been updated from 1.1.13 to 1.2.0, which is a minor version bump. This suggests new features or improvements that are backwards compatible. Please ensure that this version increment is intentional and aligns with the changes made in this release.
Could you confirm if there's a changelog or release notes for this version update? If so, please ensure it accurately reflects the changes made in this release.
18-18: Confirm compatibility with the updated SDK version.The
@rpch/sdkdependency has been updated from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. This is a minor version update, which should be backwards compatible.To ensure smooth integration, please run the following script to check for any breaking changes or important updates in the SDK:
After reviewing the changes, please confirm that all features used in this project are compatible with the new SDK version.
apps/discovery-platform/package.json (2)
19-19: LGTM: Dependency update looks good.The update of @rpch/sdk from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 is consistent with the changes described in the PR summary and aligns with updates in other projects.
Line range hint
1-33: Verify package version against PR title.The PR title mentions "Am for v2.2", but the package.json shows version 2.3.0. Could you please clarify if this discrepancy is intentional or if the package version needs to be updated to match the PR title?
packages/sdk/src/node-api.ts (1)
91-91: LGTM! RenamepeerIdtodestinationin payload.The change from
peerIdtodestinationin the payload makes the API more intuitive and general. This aligns with the PR objective of moving towards v2.2.To ensure this change doesn't break existing implementations, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might need updating due to this change.
✅ Verification successful
Rename
peerIdtodestinationVerifiedThe change does not impact message sending contexts and no remaining usages of
peerIdwere found that could cause issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'peerId' in relation to message sending # Test 1: Search for 'peerId' usage in message sending context echo "Searching for 'peerId' usage in message sending context:" rg -i 'peerId.*message' --type ts # Test 2: Search for 'destination' usage in message sending context echo "Searching for 'destination' usage in message sending context:" rg -i 'destination.*message' --type ts # Test 3: Search for sendMessage function calls echo "Searching for sendMessage function calls:" rg 'sendMessage\(' --type tsLength of output: 932
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if 'peerId' is used in message sending contexts, excluding 'entryPeerId' # Test 1: Search for 'peerId' usage in message sending context, excluding 'entryPeerId' echo "Searching for 'peerId' usage in message sending context (excluding 'entryPeerId'):" rg -i 'peerId[^a-zA-Z0-9_]?.*message' --type ts --ignore-file '!packages/compat-crypto/src/index.ts' # Test 2: Confirm that 'entryPeerId' is not related to message sending echo "Verifying 'entryPeerId' usage is unrelated to message sending:" rg -i 'entryPeerId' --type tsLength of output: 2926
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
@rpch/sdkdependency to version4.1.0across multiple projects, enhancing compatibility and performance.sendMessagefunction to usedestinationinstead ofpeerIdfor specifying message recipients.Bug Fixes
Documentation
package.jsonfiles to reflect the latest changes.